From: Rich <rg...@el...> - 2006-02-05 15:20:06
|
On 5-2-2006 10:05, Timothy Driscoll wrote: > > I'm sure that the connect command will undergo several significant > revisions in response to use in real situations. without the benefit > of that information, though, the above option sounds good to me. It seems a reasonable starting point. > for the record, my main grief on this topic was about intertwining > the wireframe and connect commands. I believe that wireframe should > not be able to change bond order, but simply whether or not to show > bond order. I very much agree with this. What I decide is the underlying chemistry for a particular molecule should not be changed by *any* display function. The functions that *do* alter the chemical nature (bonding, bond order, atom type) must be entirely separate from the display choices. Rich |