Re: [Jmol-users] wireframe vs connect

[Timothy D. <mol...@ma...>]

On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:00 p, Miguel wrote:
> On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:32 a, Angel Herraez wrote:
>>
>> 1.- I still think "connect" is more intuitive for changing bond
>> order, but I am not thinking much in terms of distance as Bob, just
>> on selecting the atoms I want to connect-disconect-change.
>>
>> 2.- Apart from "set bondmode", we also have there "set bonds" which
>> does affect rendering only. I already suggested that this might
>> interfere with the creation of new bond orders.
>>
>> 3.- Let's keep this discussion but slowly.
>
> Angel,
>
> I believe that the implementation in the 10.00.48 prerelease is in
> agreement with your mental model of how this should work.
>
> Please work Bob + Tim + others to reach agreement on the most  
> desirable
> behavior.
>

10.00.48 agrees with my concept of how these commands should work as  
well.  (I did not know about 'set bonds' in either Chime or Jmol, so  
thank you for pointing that out - sorry if it muddled the discussion  
somewhat.)

Bob, I will get back to you about your most recent proposal, but  
can't until later this evening...

tim
-- 
Timothy Driscoll                                em: mol...@ma...
molvisions - see. grasp. learn.                 ph: 919-368-2667
<http://www.molvisions.com/>                    im: molvisions
usa:virginia:blacksburg                         tx: mol...@vt...