From: Bob H. <ha...@st...> - 2006-02-28 23:53:44
|
Nico, Excellent. Then this will be fun. nve...@cl... wrote: > > It's part of the Jmol application itself, > org.openscience.jmol.app.PovraySaver. So an actual object would be > better (I don't think wee need a specific object, just a > combination of HashMap, Vector, Integer, Boolean, ...) It's > accessible through Export to Povray in the menu. Right now we have (Viewer myViewer).getProperty("atomInfo") (Viewer myViewer).getProperty("bondInfo") (Viewer myViewer).getProperty("modelInfo") (Viewer myViewer).getProperty("chainInfo") (Viewer myViewer).getProperty("polymerInfo") which all return Hashtable objects. You can explore what they produce at http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/test/json/property.htm I realize they are not optimal. I'm trying to think of ways to make them more usable. With atomInfo and bondInfo you can specify an atom set. I'm suspecting that for the povray, we should actually create one called "povrayInfo" Why don't you outline a data structure, and I'll fill it in. Bob -- Robert M. Hanson, ha...@st..., 507-646-3107 Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057 mailto:ha...@st... http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein |