From: Timothy D. <mol...@ma...> - 2005-09-15 00:24:21
|
On Sep 14, 2005, at 4:55 , Miguel wrote: > Tim wrote: > > >>> That list of 'unsupported browsers' would probably eliminate most >>> versions >>> of Safari that are in the field. >>> >>> >> the implication being that Jmol.js will drop support for these >> versions of Safari, yes? >> > > No ... I don't think we can realistically drop support for old > versions of > Safari. > phew > Q: Tim, what is your opinion about dropping Netscape 4.7 support? > no objection here. (no pun intended.) > >> what version is the cutoff, exactly, so I >> know how loudly to complain? ;-) >> > > Anything less than Safari 412.2 does not work with the <object> tag > > I think that corresponds to Safari 2.0.0 > Don't worry ... I won't drop Safari support. > oh good. that cutoff would be drastic. you know I would complain. :-) tim -- Timothy Driscoll molvisions - see. grasp. learn. <http://www.molvisions.com/> earth:usa:virginia:blacksburg |