From: Bob H. <ha...@st...> - 2005-09-01 03:41:23
|
I can imagine that if you have restricted sets or otherwise "turned off atoms" and there are lots of them (such as the way Eric has mentioned turning off different models) the user could be in for a surprise if they run a monitor to an atom that isn't there. But if this is only activated by the monitor command itself, and not by user clicking, then it should be fine to be able to do it. Imagine you have several models and you want to compare similar distances. Shouldn't you just be able to turn on and off display of the models and have the monitors go on and off with them? Or do the monitors stay, even though the model is not visible? Bob Miguel wrote: > > Q: Can anyone think of any reason why I would have written code to turn > off measurements if all of the atoms involved in the measurement are not > visible? > > > Miguel > > > ----- > Open Source Molecular Visualization > www.jmol.org > mi...@jm... > ----- > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Jmol-users mailing list > Jmo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jmol-users -- Robert M. Hanson, ha...@st..., 507-646-3107 Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057 mailto:ha...@st... http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr |