From: Bob H. <ha...@st...> - 2005-03-14 16:51:44
|
> > 2. -my biggest problem: I had my output from another MD-program > converted into something similar to a g98 file, and it worked nicely > with jmol9, including the vibrations, but now with jmol10 it fails to > load in both the application and the applet. So, what is the minimum > requirement for a gaussian.out file to be acknowledged by jmol. However, > the application does not show vibrations with the file above > (ch3oh_g94.out) either! There were definitely some changes in the Jmol reading of Gaussian files that occurred recently, and yes, it broke just this sort of application. You have to understand that the Gaussian reader is sort of a fake. (No offense.) It's taking log output from Gaussian and pretending that's some real format. Of course, who knows how the next Gaussian version will change this. So I, too, was creating fake Gaussian files, and it broke my reader. (So for that application I'm just using the old applet for now. Take a look at http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr/jmol/inline/ The second example there involves a vibration in XYZ format. And the third example shows a multiple model version of the XYZ format. Combining those two ideas you should be all set. WAY easier than faking Gaussian output! For example, if you clip the following into the XYZ format box and then "Use .loadInline()", you will see the first vibration going. 3 A x y z charge dx dy dz S -1.5 0 0 0 0 .10 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 -.10 0 S 1.5 0 0 0 0 .10 0 3 A x y z charge dx dy dz S -1.5 0 0 0 x .10 -.10 0 S 1.5 0 0 0 0 .10 0 3 A x y z charge dx dy dz S -1.5 0 0 0 0 .10 0 C 0 0 0 0 0 -.10 .10 S 1.5 0 0 0 0 .10 0 Then at the Script box below the third example, type model 2 and press "run" similarly, model 3 model 0 Bob Hanson -- Robert M. Hanson, ha...@st..., 507-646-3107 Professor of Chemistry, St. Olaf College 1520 St. Olaf Ave., Northfield, MN 55057 mailto:ha...@st... http://www.stolaf.edu/people/hansonr "Imagination is more important than knowledge." - Albert Einstein |