From: Miguel <mi...@jm...> - 2004-11-16 14:43:50
|
Andreas wrote: >>>Is this the proper way to retreive this data? >>>arghh ... NO=21 >>> >>> > oops ;-) > > > Anything that you want *must* go through the JmolViewer. > > > O.k. So all I need to know about is JmolViewer.java. Makes live easier.= > > > > I prefer to have them in a separate subdirectory because it is easie= r > to > > manager. But since people think that they are public then it looks l= ike > I > > need to move them all into the viewer directory and remove the 'publ= ic' > > designations. > > hm. What about providing an Interface for JmolViewer? I guess if there > would have been one in place, it would have stopped me from getting the= > idea to try accessing data from lower levels... Well, the JmolViewer was supposed to be the entry point. But I didn't mak= e that very clear. You have made a very good suggestion. By defining a separate interface in= the api directory (and making the existing JmolViewer an implementation o= f that interface) it would be more clear. > > > > How can the insertion code be retreived? > > > > If the JmolViewer does not provide the information that you need the= n > we > > will add it. > > > just did a test with e.g. 1h4w. it seems that getAtomSequenceCode > returns =22221=22, but not =22221A=22. > Is there a separate method to get the insertion code for a residue? Hmmm ... that sounds like a bug. I think that I intended the insertion code to be part of the 'sequence co= de'. Will investigate. Miguel |