Re: [Jmol-developers] Re: Question about use of circumventing viewer.evalString

[<rka...@ri...>]

On Nov 3, 2004, at 9:26 PM, Ren=E9 and Miguel wrote:

>>
>>> I don't really like that and was wondering
>>> whether I could make a more direct call (or via a [new] method in =
the
>>> JmolViewer) that will display a certain frame and start/stop a
>>> vibration,
>>
>> That seems quite reasonable. If I don't send you something tomorrow=20=

>> then
>> send me a reminder.
>>
Tomorrow is over, so here is the reminder :-)

I mentioned this in a later message, but I was wondering whether it=20
would be possible to have a method that will animate a list of=20
AtomSets, stored in an array of AtomSetIndices?

Question: Do you think it makes sense to have the look-and-feel of the=20=

application be determined by the OS. I was surprised by how the tree=20
(and divider bar in the split pane) looks different with the=20
look-and-feel that Jmol currently has.

That will get us closer to the idea that we may be able to pick a set=20
of AtomSets and do things with them (animation is the only one that=20
seems to make sense at this time). Seems somewhat analogous to a select=20=

command/method for atoms within a frame, but now for a select of a set=20=

of frames.

I really don't want to bug you (I see that you are very busy with other=20=

things :-), so if you feel that this is something you want to put off=20
for a bit (till after the release), that is fine with me.
I am also wondering whether you would consider having the=20
AtomSetChooser in the release, or hold of on that part. I wouldn't be=20
offended if you decided to do that :-) (as long as I can play with it=20
in my sandbox so I can finally get it to where I  want it.)

Ren=E9