Re: [jibx-users] namespaces and (un)marshalling

[Dennis S. <dm...@so...>]

Hi Cris,

I replied to your follow-up email, which I apparently misinterpreted. If 
all you want to do is always use a prefix when marshalling just specify 
that prefix on the <namespace> element in the binding. The prefix is 
*only* used for marshalling; for unmarshalling, JiBX looks only at the 
namespace URI returned by the parser and prefixes are ignored.

  - Dennis

Dennis M. Sosnoski
SOA and Web Services in Java
Training and Consulting
http://www.sosnoski.com - http://www.sosnoski.co.nz
Seattle, WA +1-425-939-0576 - Wellington, NZ +64-4-298-6117



Cris Daniluk wrote:
> I am working on a binding for a schema that is fairly complex. I've
> gotten the majority of the schema binding correctly to JibX, but I'm
> having a problem with default namespaces. Essentially, the majority of
> the users of the schema use a default namespace, which I've set in
> order to unmarshal correctly. However, when I marshal back out, I'd
> like to always include the prefix, as the destination of the marshaled
> content does not understand default namespaces correctly. Because the
> bindings are generated as bytecode, I can't find a way to explicitly
> force the marshaling to use a different default="" rule for the
> namespace.
>
> Is there a way to do this? The best I've been able to come up with so
> far is a brutal hack that I just don't like..
>
> Thanks!
>
> - Cris
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
> _______________________________________________
> jibx-users mailing list
> jib...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jibx-users
>
>