[Jfs-discussion] [PATCH 0/2] jfs: neatening

[Joe P. <jo...@pe...>]

The second patch is speculative and maybe not necessary.

Is a 3KB reduction in object size when embedded and !CONFIG_PRINTK worth it?

Joe Perches (2):
  jfs: Update jfs_error
  jfs: Reduce object size when CONFIG_PRINTK=n

 fs/jfs/jfs_dmap.c       | 70 +++++++++++++++++++------------------------------
 fs/jfs/jfs_dtree.c      | 37 +++++++++++++-------------
 fs/jfs/jfs_extent.c     |  2 +-
 fs/jfs/jfs_imap.c       | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++----------------------------
 fs/jfs/jfs_metapage.c   |  5 ++--
 fs/jfs/jfs_superblock.h | 17 +++++++++++-
 fs/jfs/jfs_txnmgr.c     |  2 +-
 fs/jfs/jfs_xtree.c      | 62 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 fs/jfs/namei.c          |  2 +-
 fs/jfs/resize.c         |  2 +-
 fs/jfs/super.c          | 24 ++++++++++-------
 fs/jfs/xattr.c          |  4 +--
 12 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 154 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.1.2.459.gbcd45b4.dirty