From: Greg W. <gr...@mo...> - 2003-10-30 06:36:08
|
je...@i3... wrote: >>The buf that is being exposes is part of the standard >>API for the class, so it should be portable. > > True. Except that the javadocs say nothing about the length of "buf". But it does expose count, which I'm using. >>I'll work on a patch for this shortly. The fix to use the count is checked into head hand Jetty_4_2 branch now. Releases out this weekend. >>Note that it the grand scheme of things, I do agree with you that >>the approach is wrong. Ideally I would like to parse the form >>content as it arrives and not have to have it completely in a buffer >>at all (thus I could have a fixed size buffer that is reused). >>I'll be looking at doing this in JettyExperimental. > > Sounds good. I ought to take a look at JettyExperimental sometime, as it > sounds like a good fit for what we do. It's getting close to usable now... If I can find another day or two spare I hope to do an alpha release of it. cheers |