Re: [jdee-devel] Subversion updates
Brought to you by:
paullandes
From: Phillip L. <phi...@ne...> - 2009-05-13 09:30:42
|
Lennart Borgman <len...@gm...> writes: >> this is, for the most part, the same conversation that paul and i have >> had (perhaps several times) - the move from subversion to git is not >> required, either now or after the next stable release, and (to be >> fair) will likely involve at least minor pain; but i do see benefit in >> this move on several levels - including *PR* for the jdee, given git's >> rapidly (and justified, IMHO) increasing popularity. (i don't know >> how many avid git users there are on this list, but i've seen at least >> a couple mentions of the jdee in github repos, including copies/forks >> of the source.) > > > Wouldn't it be better to move to bazaar since that is what Emacs will do? It does git as well, as it happens. Actually, I've sort of moved from bzr to git because Emacs DVC works better with git for me. Bottom line is, the advent of distributed versioning may be a good thing, but the flip side is that there are now multiple systems where their used to be just CVS or SVN. If we can get a new release of JDEE out, this would be the main thing. After that, if we choose to move, I'd suggest we just vote on what to move to rather than argue the merits of different DVC systems; I've seen enough threads about that to last a lifetime and would love to avoid another. Phil |