From: Alex B. <boi...@in...> - 2006-02-17 21:37:16
|
I'm a little concerned about adding MVCC to DBCache after the fact. But then again I agree that moving from the current JDBM architecture to DBCache is more incremental. I could help with the implementation of B-link in parallel to the DBCache work. alex Thompson, Bryan B. wrote: >Regardless it seems that we could incrementally improve jdbm right >now by: > >1. integrating DBCache for VLR Tx support (but without concurrency). > >2. integrating the b-link support into the b+tree to support index >traversal under concurrent modification. > >-bryan > > |