From: Charlton B. <cha...@gm...> - 2004-01-15 22:39:26
|
Hi Adrian, I've posted my fix/reimplementation to ManagementBean and affected classes. Thanks for your time and help in this process. Best, -Charlton. On Jan 14, 2004, at 12:03, Charlton Barreto wrote: > Hi Adrian, > > On Jan 14, 2004, at 11:42, Adrian Brock wrote: > >> Hi Charlton, >> >> In anycase the implementation should probably be using >> MBeanServerConnection rather than MBeanServer. >> > > This makes sense to me. I can reimplement using MBeanServerConnection > and test. Please let me know if there's any reason doing this wouldn't > make sense. > > Best, > > -Charlton. > >> Regards, >> Adrian >> >> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 19:41, Charlton Barreto wrote: >>> Hi Adrian, >>> >>> Sorry, my bad, I should have sent my updated file. I will be posting >>> soon to www.sf.net/projects/jboss (to HEAD). >>> >>> I was curious if there was any reason the JMX 1.2 impls were not >>> included in ManagementBean/HEAD? Please let me know.... >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> -Charlton. >>> >>> On Jan 14, 2004, at 09:14, Adrian Brock wrote: >>> >>>> Charlton, >>>> >>>> It looks like your patch (for head?) is exactly the same >>>> as the class in 3.2 with the javadocs removed and >>>> the whitespace corrupted. >>>> >>>> Is that correct? If not, post a patch/bug at >>>> www.sf.net/projects/jboss >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Adrian >>>> >>>> On Wed, 2004-01-14 at 16:42, Marc Fleury wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> ___________________________________________________________________ >>>>> ___ >>>>> From: Charlton Barreto [mailto:cha...@gm...] >>>>> Sent: Tue 1/13/2004 8:54 PM >>>>> To: Marc Fleury; Andreas Schaefer >>>>> Subject: fix to org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Sorry to bother you, but I had a fix for >>>>> org.jboss.management.mejb.ManagementBean (attached) reflecting the >>>>> (recent) changes to JMX. Since I don't have rw access to the JBoss >>>>> repository, I'm asking if you either of you could check it in. I've >>>>> tested this in the build and it appears to be OK. >>>>> >>>>> If there is another process I should or could use for such >>>>> check-ins >>>>> please let me know. >>>>> >>>>> -Charlton Barreto. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> -- >>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> Adrian Brock >>>> Director of Support >>>> Back Office >>>> JBoss Group, LLC >>>> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. >>>> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System >>>> offering >>>> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. >>>> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> JBoss-Development mailing list >>>> JBo...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >>>> >> -- >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> Adrian Brock >> Director of Support >> Back Office >> JBoss Group, LLC >> xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. >> Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering >> advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. >> Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html >> _______________________________________________ >> JBoss-Development mailing list >> JBo...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Perforce Software. > Perforce is the Fast Software Configuration Management System offering > advanced branching capabilities and atomic changes on 50+ platforms. > Free Eval! http://www.perforce.com/perforce/loadprog.html > _______________________________________________ > JBoss-Development mailing list > JBo...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development > |