From: Scott M S. <sco...@at...> - 2003-05-21 17:15:17
|
As stated in other email, I want to know exactly what bm is saving me in terms of build.xml task constructs so I'm interested in diff between the bm vs Ant alone setup. xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Scott Stark Chief Technology Officer JBoss Group, LLC xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx ----- Original Message ----- From: <joe...@us...> To: <jbo...@li...> Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2003 12:37 AM Subject: [JBoss-dev] Re: Why go forward with buildmagic? > Hi All, > > I am an escapee from the jboss-user-request list, but thought that I > should chime in with my .02 worth as a dedicated JBoss user. > > We have been using JBoss in our projects since last year and love it. > However, we always had problems working with the > buildmagic stuff. We are dedicated Ant users and use Ant for all of our > projects. After looking through the buildmagic stuff, I > became convinced that *most* of the functionality could be done in > straight Ant, and in fact we are in the middle of porting all > of the JBoss build routines to straight Ant...primarily because we > already have Ant scripts that can be easily incorporated into the > build routine that run our shop QA tests and generate custom .html build > reports. > > So *for what it's worth*, from a user's point of view...we would love it > if Ant *officially* because the build tool of JBoss without the > buildmagic wrapper... > > Best, > Joel |