Re: [JBoss-dev] JSR-77 refactoring has begun

[Scott M S. <sco...@at...>]

I browsed back through the latest spec and I am still not sure what some of these objects
represent, but that is not important for my initial focus. What I want is to remove the
dependency on JSR-77 components from the core layer. Right now even the minimal
configuration has to include the 

Beyond that, which management objects should or should not have MBean representations
is up for debate and I'm not sure I care one way or the other in the absence of a prototype
that indicates obvious advantages. Having a lot of objects is not in itself a very good
reason to not use MBeans if there are overriding advantages.

xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Scott Stark
Chief Technology Officer
JBoss Group, LLC
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Sacha Labourey" <Sac...@ml...>
To: <jbo...@li...>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 10:43 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-dev] JSR-77 refactoring has begun


> Are you sure? I don't read the spec like that... As I understand it, you
> don't need an MBean for every jndi ref, url ref, etc. but for every JNDI
> service, etc. If you take a look at the EJBModule or EntitBean, I don't see
> such a thing.