Re: [JBoss-user] EAR works in 2.4.10 but not in 3.0.6

[Rod M. <mai...@pa...>]

Posting your application.xml file would help. You have a jar file floating
out there (eif-service_locator.jar) but where is that referenced and what is
its module type? I assume it contains vanilla beans. Where does it say that
you can put jar files in the root of an EAR and expect them to be
accessible? That is not a rhetorical question: maybe you have a more
accurate reference than me. Here is a theory: 2.4.10 was loading that jar in
the EAR class loader when it should not have been doing so?

I have a couple of corollary questions. The first one the MANIFST.MF
Class-Path settings which appear to have on-again-off-again functionality
depending on the version you have - ditto for weblogic. Those settings
appear to be part of the deployment description so why not put them in the
deployment descriptor? It really stands out like a sore thumb. That is a
J2EE standards question mind you. The second question is regarding the
<java> module in an application.xml file. That works perfectly in JBoss for
loading jars with EAR scope. Should it? A jar of vanilla beans is not a J2EE
client application so how does that load in the first place? I am glad it
works and wish they could just stipulate that a <java> module can be used to
load utility jars. Mine is not to question why... :)



----- Original Message -----
From: "Demyanovich, Craig - Apogent" <cde...@ap...>
To: <jbo...@li...>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 7:35 AM
Subject: RE: [JBoss-user] EAR works in 2.4.10 but not in 3.0.6


> > Here's the structure of my EAR file:
> >
> > <root>
> >     META-INF
> >         MANIFEST.MF
> >         application.xml
> >     ejb
> >         BatchAddition.jar
> >         ...
> >     eif-service_locator.jar
> >     ....
> > </root>
>
> Please, does anyone have any ideas why the EAR structure above works in
> 2.4.x but not in 3.0.5, 3.0.6 or 3.2.0RC1?  I apologize if the tone in my
> previous posts turned anyone away.  I did say that this issue does not
> affect anything in production, but I would like to move to JBoss 3.x as
soon
> as I can.
>
> Thanks for your help,
> Craig
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.NET email is sponsored by:
> SourceForge Enterprise Edition + IBM + LinuxWorld = Something 2 See!
> http://www.vasoftware.com
> _______________________________________________
> JBoss-user mailing list
> JBo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-user