Re: [JBoss-dev] Multipule MBeanServers

[Jason D. <ja...@pl...>]

Do you know if there are any other standard bus-like frameworks out
there, which could be used here instead of jmx, leaving jmx free for
admin only?

--jason


On Thu, 2002-02-14 at 15:06, Trevor Squires wrote:
> 
> Hey,
> 
> It would seem the best qualified to answer would be on the jmx-forum list.
> 
> However, if you want an opinion, the quickest answer I can contrive is for
> application partitioning, especially when assembling an
> application/subsystem management view using MBeans from multiple vendors.
> 
> One thing to bear in mind is that, ok I know this is going to sound really
> obvious, JMX is an api whose intent is to allow you to expose things for
> *managment*.
> 
> Personally, I think your question stems from the knowledge that JBoss
> could not survive without the MBeanServer.  I recently explained to a
> colleage my opinion that EJB (and perhaps most of J2EE) is nothing more
> than a great big third party binding see
> http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ThirdPartyBinding
> 
> In JBoss the intercomponent bus for the binding is JMX.
> 
> That's a far cry from "and here's how your application can be managed by
> ZippyConsole version2.0".
> 
> Change your frame of reference and perhaps the question will answer
> itself.
> 
> Regards,
> Trev
> 
> On 14 Feb 2002, Jason Dillon wrote:
> 
> > Can some one explain to me why anyone would want to do this?  I assume
> > there is a reason for is since the jmx api folks put it there... but I
> > just don't understand why.
> > 
> > Can some body drop some knowledge on this?
> > 
> > --jason
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > Jboss-development mailing list
> > Jbo...@li...
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development
> > 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Jboss-development mailing list
> Jbo...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/jboss-development