javabeantester-users Mailing List for JavaBean Tester
Status: Beta
Brought to you by:
micah_modell
You can subscribe to this list here.
2003 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
(1) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2004 |
Jan
(8) |
Feb
|
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(1) |
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
2005 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(8) |
Oct
(3) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
2007 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
(2) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2007-09-26 11:37:00
|
R29vZCBxdWVzdGlvbiwgYnV0IG5vLCBJIGRpZCBub3QuICBJIHN0YXJ0ZWQgdG8sIGJ1dCBJIGZp bmQgdGhhdCBUREQgaXMgYQpiaXQgYW5ub3lpbmcgYmVjYXVzZSB0aGVuIHlvdXIgZmlyc3Qgc2V0 IG9mIGNsYXNzZXMgZG9lc24ndCBjb21waWxlIHVudGlsCnlvdSBmaW5pc2ggdGhlIHNlY29uZCBz ZXQgKGJlY2F1c2UgdGhlcmUgYXJlIG5vIGNsYXNzZXMgZm9yIGl0IHRvIGNhbGwKaW50bykuCgpX aHkgZG8geW91IGFzaz8KCkNoZWVycyEKTWljYWgKCk9uIDkvMjYvMDcsIFByemVteXOzYXcgU3pr dWRsYXJlayA8bXVtaW5raUBvMi5wbD4gd3JvdGU6Cj4KPiBIZWxsbwo+Cj4gRGlkIHlvdSBjcmVh dGUgSmF2YUJlYW4gVGVzdGVyIHVzaW5nIFRlc3QgRHJpdmVuIERldmVsb3BtZW50Pwo+Cj4gRGVm aW5pdGlvbiBmcm9tIHdpa2lwZWRpYS5vcmc6ICJUZXN0LURyaXZlbiBEZXZlbG9wbWVudCAoVERE KSBpcyBhCj4gc29mdHdhcmUgZGV2ZWxvcG1lbnQgdGVjaG5pcXVlIHRoYXQgaW52b2x2ZXMgcmVw ZWF0ZWRseSBmaXJzdCB3cml0aW5nIGEgdGVzdAo+IGNhc2UgYW5kIHRoZW4gaW1wbGVtZW50aW5n IG9ubHkgdGhlIGNvZGUgbmVjZXNzYXJ5IHRvIHBhc3MgdGhlIHRlc3QiCj4KPiBCZXN0IHJlZ2Fy ZHMsCj4gUHJ6ZW1lawo+Cj4gLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0t LS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLS0tLQo+IFRoaXMgU0YubmV0IGVtYWlsIGlz IHNwb25zb3JlZCBieTogTWljcm9zb2Z0Cj4gRGVmeSBhbGwgY2hhbGxlbmdlcy4gTWljcm9zb2Z0 KFIpIFZpc3VhbCBTdHVkaW8gMjAwNS4KPiBodHRwOi8vY2xrLmF0ZG10LmNvbS9NUlQvZ28vdnNl MDEyMDAwMDA3MG1ydC9kaXJlY3QvMDEvCj4gX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX19f X19fX19fX19fX19fX19fX18KPiBKYXZhYmVhbnRlc3Rlci11c2VycyBtYWlsaW5nIGxpc3QKPiBK YXZhYmVhbnRlc3Rlci11c2Vyc0BsaXN0cy5zb3VyY2Vmb3JnZS5uZXQKPiBodHRwczovL2xpc3Rz LnNvdXJjZWZvcmdlLm5ldC9saXN0cy9saXN0aW5mby9qYXZhYmVhbnRlc3Rlci11c2Vycwo+CgoK Ci0tIApodHRwOi8vd3d3LmNzaC5yaXQuZWR1L35taWNhaApodHRwOi8vd3d3LkxpdmVKb3VybmFs LmNvbS91c2Vycy9taWNhaF9naWRlb24KSXQgaXMgbm90IG5vYmxlIHRvIGJlIGJldHRlciB0aGFu IG90aGVycy4KSXQgaXMgbm9ibGUgdG8gYmUgYmV0dGVyIHRoYW4geW91ciBmb3JtZXIgc2VsZi4K |
From: <mu...@o2...> - 2007-09-26 09:38:48
|
Hello=20 Did=20you=20create=20JavaBean=20Tester=20using=20Test=20Driven=20Developm= ent?=20 Definition=20from=20wikipedia.org:=20"Test-Driven=20Development=20(TDD)=20= is=20a=20software=20development=20technique=20that=20involves=20repeatedl= y=20first=20writing=20a=20test=20case=20and=20then=20implementing=20only=20= the=20code=20necessary=20to=20pass=20the=20test"=20 =20 Best=20regards, Przemek |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-10-29 09:12:57
|
Any progress? On 10/3/05, Micah Gideon Modell <mic...@gm...> wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > I haven't changed anything relating to the project or its permissions > and the CVS change logs do indicate that you (bayard) have committed > changes in the past, so I'm going to have to say that you can > connect. On the other hand, one of the problems that I always face > in playing with this project is that if you are not connecting > anonymously, you must use SSH as your cvs transport (CVS_RSH). There > are some decent docs on SF for logging in and connecting, but if you > are still having trouble after going through the SF stuff, let me > know and I'll see what I can do. > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > - -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon > AIM: Micah Modell > [...] good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they > are. (Philip Pullman) > > > > > Thus spake Henri Yandell on Oct 4, 2005, at 12:59 AM: > > > > > Any idea if I have CVS access turned on at the moment? > > > > I thought that would be automatic as I'm a member of the project, > > but I'm having a lot of trouble getting things to work. Which is > > embaressing as I've a long history of administering CVS servers. > > Will have another try tomorrow, just thought I'd check if it was > > something under your control. > > > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > > > > >> I just looked and now I know! My last addition was indexed > >> property support and you had a memory problem when testing it. > >> Please look over this functionality and test it to see if you > >> still have that <whatever the problem was>. Please confirm that > >> indexed property support is solid before you post the dev. version > >> to iBiblio. > >> > > > > Will do. > > > > > >> Have you looked at any of the other items in the Tracker? > >> > > > > Nope, will continue sending myself mental nudges to get things > > moving more. > > > > Hen > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > > discussions, > > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > > _______________________________________________ > > Javabeantester-users mailing list > > Jav...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > > > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFDQiAH6IzK3cZIYNkRAmdsAKCi/rW6Kc3l2mqqdmHj/Eu3R2bbuwCeJ2j2 > 2uQSOxp2uJ9HBrlODv18qiM=3D > =3DLMl2 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon It is not noble to be better than others. It is noble to be better than youf former self. |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-10-04 06:48:49
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 I haven't changed anything relating to the project or its permissions and the CVS change logs do indicate that you (bayard) have committed changes in the past, so I'm going to have to say that you can connect. On the other hand, one of the problems that I always face in playing with this project is that if you are not connecting anonymously, you must use SSH as your cvs transport (CVS_RSH). There are some decent docs on SF for logging in and connecting, but if you are still having trouble after going through the SF stuff, let me know and I'll see what I can do. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell - -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon AIM: Micah Modell [...] good and evil are names for what people do, not for what they are. (Philip Pullman) Thus spake Henri Yandell on Oct 4, 2005, at 12:59 AM: > > Any idea if I have CVS access turned on at the moment? > > I thought that would be automatic as I'm a member of the project, > but I'm having a lot of trouble getting things to work. Which is > embaressing as I've a long history of administering CVS servers. > Will have another try tomorrow, just thought I'd check if it was > something under your control. > > On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > >> I just looked and now I know! My last addition was indexed >> property support and you had a memory problem when testing it. >> Please look over this functionality and test it to see if you >> still have that <whatever the problem was>. Please confirm that >> indexed property support is solid before you post the dev. version >> to iBiblio. >> > > Will do. > > >> Have you looked at any of the other items in the Tracker? >> > > Nope, will continue sending myself mental nudges to get things > moving more. > > Hen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Power Architecture Resource Center: Free content, downloads, > discussions, > and more. http://solutions.newsforge.com/ibmarch.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDQiAH6IzK3cZIYNkRAmdsAKCi/rW6Kc3l2mqqdmHj/Eu3R2bbuwCeJ2j2 2uQSOxp2uJ9HBrlODv18qiM= =LMl2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2005-10-04 04:59:53
|
Any idea if I have CVS access turned on at the moment? I thought that would be automatic as I'm a member of the project, but I'm having a lot of trouble getting things to work. Which is embaressing as I've a long history of administering CVS servers. Will have another try tomorrow, just thought I'd check if it was something under your control. On Wed, 14 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > I just looked and now I know! My last addition was indexed property support > and you had a memory problem when testing it. Please look over this > functionality and test it to see if you still have that <whatever the problem > was>. Please confirm that indexed property support is solid before you post > the dev. version to iBiblio. Will do. > Have you looked at any of the other items in the Tracker? Nope, will continue sending myself mental nudges to get things moving more. Hen |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-09-14 01:58:22
|
I just looked and now I know! My last addition was indexed property support and you had a memory problem when testing it. Please look over this functionality and test it to see if you still have that <whatever the problem was>. Please confirm that indexed property support is solid before you post the dev. version to iBiblio. I have never actually used Maven although I've heard great things. I remember you said you'd added some form of support for it to CVS and that's great. Perhaps one of these days I'll have need to look at it and gain the same appreciation for it you seem to have. For the rules, I supposed you could do that without much difficulty. Create a jbtRuleBean class to contain them and then pass the appropriate bean in the constructor or so? It sounds nice. Have you looked at any of the other items in the Tracker? Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon AIM: Micah Modell Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival. (W. Edwards Deming) Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 14, 2005, at 6:10 AM: > > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > >> Do I mind if you post to ibiblio? Definitely not! Go right ahead >> and post this until you're heart's content! It is not fully >> tested and quite a memory hog if you use the development features >> if I remember correctly, but please go ahead! I'd love to see us >> get more users. >> > > Should make it a lot easier for people to use us if they use Maven. > I can push it in via osjava.org's rsync. > > >> I can definitely agree with removing the logging altogether if >> we're using it so little. I rather liked it, but I can see your >> point - it's probably unnecessary. I can also agree with >> migrating the Asserts back to 1.3 on the condition that you add to >> the class level comments the reason for the decision not to >> implement 1.4 Asserts. I was quite happy with and proud of that >> Ant build script, but I guess I've got to be able to kill my baby, >> eh? >> > > Yeah, it's always hard to choose simplicity over coolness :) > > >> What else have you got in mind? >> > > Bug I hit was that it didn't support byte[], (or the others), so > I've added the primitive[] and non-nested object arrays. Need to > make it so it can be recursive. > > Next problem I have is one I've hit before, coming up with a way to > configure the rules for the tests. I'm thinking of adding methods > per rule that return a String[] of properties to not run. > > ie) > > BaseTestCase.java > > // ie) == > public String[] ignoreEquality() { > return new String[] { "name" }; > } > > // ie) .equals() > public String[] ignoreEquals() { > return new String[] { "age" }; > } > > // ie) all tests > public String[] ignore() { > return new String[] { "foo" }; > } > > These would be arguments for the JBeanTester somehow. > > JBeanTester just found a 'bug' in a JMS implementation I'm working > on. The property has two ways of being set, > setJMSCorrelationIDAsBytes and setJMSCorrelationID (a String). I > implemented the Bytes one by converting to a String, and > JBeanTester pointed out that that means the same object doesn't > come out of getJMSCorrelationIDAsBytes as went in. > > Weird to use CVS outside of work again; I've been on Subversion for > a whiel now :) > > Hen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is sponsored by: > Tame your development challenges with Apache's Geronimo App Server. > Download > it for free - -and be entered to win a 42" plasma tv or your very own > Sony(tm)PSP. Click here to play: http://sourceforge.net/geronimo.php > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2005-09-13 21:10:38
|
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > Do I mind if you post to ibiblio? Definitely not! Go right ahead and post > this until you're heart's content! It is not fully tested and quite a memory > hog if you use the development features if I remember correctly, but please > go ahead! I'd love to see us get more users. Should make it a lot easier for people to use us if they use Maven. I can push it in via osjava.org's rsync. > I can definitely agree with removing the logging altogether if we're using it > so little. I rather liked it, but I can see your point - it's probably > unnecessary. I can also agree with migrating the Asserts back to 1.3 on the > condition that you add to the class level comments the reason for the > decision not to implement 1.4 Asserts. I was quite happy with and proud of > that Ant build script, but I guess I've got to be able to kill my baby, eh? Yeah, it's always hard to choose simplicity over coolness :) > What else have you got in mind? Bug I hit was that it didn't support byte[], (or the others), so I've added the primitive[] and non-nested object arrays. Need to make it so it can be recursive. Next problem I have is one I've hit before, coming up with a way to configure the rules for the tests. I'm thinking of adding methods per rule that return a String[] of properties to not run. ie) BaseTestCase.java // ie) == public String[] ignoreEquality() { return new String[] { "name" }; } // ie) .equals() public String[] ignoreEquals() { return new String[] { "age" }; } // ie) all tests public String[] ignore() { return new String[] { "foo" }; } These would be arguments for the JBeanTester somehow. JBeanTester just found a 'bug' in a JMS implementation I'm working on. The property has two ways of being set, setJMSCorrelationIDAsBytes and setJMSCorrelationID (a String). I implemented the Bytes one by converting to a String, and JBeanTester pointed out that that means the same object doesn't come out of getJMSCorrelationIDAsBytes as went in. Weird to use CVS outside of work again; I've been on Subversion for a whiel now :) Hen |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-09-12 18:14:21
|
Do I mind if you post to ibiblio? Definitely not! Go right ahead and post this until you're heart's content! It is not fully tested and quite a memory hog if you use the development features if I remember correctly, but please go ahead! I'd love to see us get more users. I can definitely agree with removing the logging altogether if we're using it so little. I rather liked it, but I can see your point - it's probably unnecessary. I can also agree with migrating the Asserts back to 1.3 on the condition that you add to the class level comments the reason for the decision not to implement 1.4 Asserts. I was quite happy with and proud of that Ant build script, but I guess I've got to be able to kill my baby, eh? What else have you got in mind? Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon AIM: Micah Modell Yeah, life's a game, but if ya don't play like it means somethin', they look at ya funny. (RM6f9 - Slashdot User) Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 12, 2005, at 9:59 AM: > > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> As I'm a bit out of the industry at the moment, I've got a couple >> of questions for you: >> 1. Which version of Java is most often used at the moment, 1.3, >> 1.4 or 1.5? >> > > My gut says 1.4, but it's not with any form of actual research. > migrating to 1.5 (aka 5.0) is probably now starting to become an > item for many places. Jakarta Commons tends to target 1.3 for most > of its components. > > >> 2. Does it seem that many people use the builtin Java Assert and >> Logging mechanisms or do most people continue to use the >> substitutes they'd built previously? >> > > No real clue. I don't know of anyone particularly using the > Logging, and I've never seen the Asserts in code. > > >> 3. What interesting new features are there in 1.5 that I should >> care about? >> > > Compiler tricks: > > Generics > Easier for loop > Annotations (ie make up your own @tag system a la xdoclet) > Importing variables (ie import java.lang.String.* to get all the > public finals in String...) > Varargs (ie println("gfoo", "qqq", "weewe", "weqwq", "qwqw") and so on > > Probably a couple of others I've forgotten. Lots of noise and not > really that much that makes a huge difference to programming, least > not in the direction of good :) > > >> 4. Why do you want to remove the support for 1.4 features? The >> work is already done and it doesn't seem to add any extra work >> because Ant takes the appropriate files from the appropriate >> places. Do you think it would be confusing to leave it in? >> > > An urge for simplification on unnecessary features. > > We're not really using logging, so it'd be nice to just drop that > and avoid the 1.3 version with a dependency on log4j. > > I'm less sure on the asserts. > > http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/lang/assert.html is an > interesting page, and seems to suggest that if we use asserts we > can't run the code under 1.3 (I was unsure if asserts in 1.4 were > just a compiler trick or a language change etc, seems it requires > 1.4 only API calls), but that they're better performance than > rolling your own Assert class. Not that we need performance here. > > >> I'm definitely not saying no - I'm inclined to do it because your >> reasons make sense. I just want a bit more information. >> >> It's nice to be talking about this again and feeling like the >> project isn't dead! I'd love to see it lift it's head one more time! >> > > Me too. This is a standard habit of mine, when I look at a codebase > for the first time (or the first time in a while) my first thought > is "how can this be simpler?". > > By the way, do you mind if I release a development snapshot jar to > www.ibiblio.org? > > Hen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * > Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ > bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2005-09-12 00:59:56
|
On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > As I'm a bit out of the industry at the moment, I've got a couple of > questions for you: > 1. Which version of Java is most often used at the moment, 1.3, 1.4 or 1.5? My gut says 1.4, but it's not with any form of actual research. migrating to 1.5 (aka 5.0) is probably now starting to become an item for many places. Jakarta Commons tends to target 1.3 for most of its components. > 2. Does it seem that many people use the builtin Java Assert and Logging > mechanisms or do most people continue to use the substitutes they'd built > previously? No real clue. I don't know of anyone particularly using the Logging, and I've never seen the Asserts in code. > 3. What interesting new features are there in 1.5 that I should care about? Compiler tricks: Generics Easier for loop Annotations (ie make up your own @tag system a la xdoclet) Importing variables (ie import java.lang.String.* to get all the public finals in String...) Varargs (ie println("gfoo", "qqq", "weewe", "weqwq", "qwqw") and so on Probably a couple of others I've forgotten. Lots of noise and not really that much that makes a huge difference to programming, least not in the direction of good :) > 4. Why do you want to remove the support for 1.4 features? The work is > already done and it doesn't seem to add any extra work because Ant takes the > appropriate files from the appropriate places. Do you think it would be > confusing to leave it in? An urge for simplification on unnecessary features. We're not really using logging, so it'd be nice to just drop that and avoid the 1.3 version with a dependency on log4j. I'm less sure on the asserts. http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.4.2/docs/guide/lang/assert.html is an interesting page, and seems to suggest that if we use asserts we can't run the code under 1.3 (I was unsure if asserts in 1.4 were just a compiler trick or a language change etc, seems it requires 1.4 only API calls), but that they're better performance than rolling your own Assert class. Not that we need performance here. > I'm definitely not saying no - I'm inclined to do it because your reasons > make sense. I just want a bit more information. > > It's nice to be talking about this again and feeling like the project isn't > dead! I'd love to see it lift it's head one more time! Me too. This is a standard habit of mine, when I look at a codebase for the first time (or the first time in a while) my first thought is "how can this be simpler?". By the way, do you mind if I release a development snapshot jar to www.ibiblio.org? Hen |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-09-10 01:05:35
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 As I'm a bit out of the industry at the moment, I've got a couple of questions for you: 1. Which version of Java is most often used at the moment, 1.3, 1.4 or 1.5? 2. Does it seem that many people use the builtin Java Assert and Logging mechanisms or do most people continue to use the substitutes they'd built previously? 3. What interesting new features are there in 1.5 that I should care about? 4. Why do you want to remove the support for 1.4 features? The work is already done and it doesn't seem to add any extra work because Ant takes the appropriate files from the appropriate places. Do you think it would be confusing to leave it in? I'm definitely not saying no - I'm inclined to do it because your reasons make sense. I just want a bit more information. It's nice to be talking about this again and feeling like the project isn't dead! I'd love to see it lift it's head one more time! Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell - -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon AIM: Micah Modell Those are my principles. If you don't like them, I have others. (Groucho Marx) Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 10, 2005, at 2:40 AM: > > It's good to feel mentally energetic again :) > > Logging on an application is great, but for a library it adds extra > pain (considering the need for a dependency or 1.4). The only > reason to have it (I think) is if you want the user to be able to > debug their own problems, but when you look at what we actually > have in there, there's only one debug statement. > > The rest are logs where an error of some kind occurred and our > library should just be throwing those exceptions up for the guy > above to deal with. > > My 2 cents anyway :) > > Hen > > On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Great to hear from you! >> >> Honestly, it's been quite a while since I've done any real >> development, much less touched Java. I don't know what TestNG is, >> but I imagine your idea for eliminating the 1.4 tree is probably >> good. >> >> I don't agree that we should dump logging though. This isn't a >> high performance product or anything - why shouldn't we have >> logging in there? >> >> Also, I'd love it if you'd test that most recent stuff I threw in >> there (I even forget what it was). I remember you saying that it >> broke on your stuff, but I don't remember what it was or why it >> broke. >> >> >> Cheers! >> >> Micah Gideon Modell >> - -- >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah >> http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon >> AIM: Micah Modell >> Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. >> (Malcolm Forbes) >> >> >> >> Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 9, 2005, at 11:12 PM: >> >> >>> Hi Micah, >>> What do you think to the following: >>> * Dump the 1.3/1.4 split, instead just using the 1.3 Assert class >>> (ie is 1.4 assert really giving us anything beyond being cool and >>> modern, something a well-used library doesn't get to be). >>> My only other suggestion here is to become dependent on JUnit, >>> but now that TestNG and other test platforms are out there, >>> carrying our own Assert class around probably makes sense. >>> Another possibility is compiling under 1.4 and believing the jar >>> will work under 1.2/1.3. Unsure if that'll work for asserts, not >>> sure what the trickery was to get them. >>> * Dump logging (well-used libraries can't afford to lug logging >>> around with them). >>> There are two FATAL log entries, which are unimportant really as >>> we then throw an Error (should make them RuntimeExceptions I think). >>> Six WARNINGs, which probably should throw RuntimeExceptions, be >>> less forgiving of crap input. >>> Two INFO's, one of which should be a WARNING and one of which is >>> our one and only debug statement :) >>> -- >>> I've been out of commission pretty much for the last year, baby >>> and then one of those mentally draining illnesses that you don't >>> realise you have unti 6 months later a course of antibiotics >>> performs a miracle. Back now though :) >>> Hen >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >>> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle >>> Practices >>> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * >>> Testing & QA >>> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ >>> bsce5sf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Javabeantester-users mailing list >>> Jav...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >>> >> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) >> >> iD8DBQFDIbar6IzK3cZIYNkRAk3zAKCXPo/NXPnGHX+nHUMgftHEHno7EwCggZ7r >> RVjhnDM+I3fqrfUq/SsiGEA= >> =ljjM >> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle >> Practices >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * >> Testing & QA >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ >> bsce5sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Javabeantester-users mailing list >> Jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >> >> > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * > Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ > bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDIjE/6IzK3cZIYNkRArP9AJ9oulzHnVInTHidvORh8cT//nOdlQCePIHs UTsTrpOowQkIawIGGxrrWgA= =/Ef6 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2005-09-09 17:40:46
|
It's good to feel mentally energetic again :) Logging on an application is great, but for a library it adds extra pain (considering the need for a dependency or 1.4). The only reason to have it (I think) is if you want the user to be able to debug their own problems, but when you look at what we actually have in there, there's only one debug statement. The rest are logs where an error of some kind occurred and our library should just be throwing those exceptions up for the guy above to deal with. My 2 cents anyway :) Hen On Sat, 10 Sep 2005, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Great to hear from you! > > Honestly, it's been quite a while since I've done any real development, much > less touched Java. I don't know what TestNG is, but I imagine your idea for > eliminating the 1.4 tree is probably good. > > I don't agree that we should dump logging though. This isn't a high > performance product or anything - why shouldn't we have logging in there? > > Also, I'd love it if you'd test that most recent stuff I threw in there (I > even forget what it was). I remember you saying that it broke on your stuff, > but I don't remember what it was or why it broke. > > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > - -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon > AIM: Micah Modell > Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. (Malcolm > Forbes) > > > > Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 9, 2005, at 11:12 PM: > >> >> Hi Micah, >> >> What do you think to the following: >> >> * Dump the 1.3/1.4 split, instead just using the 1.3 Assert class (ie is >> 1.4 assert really giving us anything beyond being cool and modern, >> something a well-used library doesn't get to be). >> >> My only other suggestion here is to become dependent on JUnit, but now that >> TestNG and other test platforms are out there, carrying our own Assert >> class around probably makes sense. >> >> Another possibility is compiling under 1.4 and believing the jar will work >> under 1.2/1.3. Unsure if that'll work for asserts, not sure what the >> trickery was to get them. >> >> * Dump logging (well-used libraries can't afford to lug logging around with >> them). >> >> There are two FATAL log entries, which are unimportant really as we then >> throw an Error (should make them RuntimeExceptions I think). >> >> Six WARNINGs, which probably should throw RuntimeExceptions, be less >> forgiving of crap input. >> >> Two INFO's, one of which should be a WARNING and one of which is our one >> and only debug statement :) >> >> -- >> >> I've been out of commission pretty much for the last year, baby and then >> one of those mentally draining illnesses that you don't realise you have >> unti 6 months later a course of antibiotics performs a miracle. Back now >> though :) >> >> Hen >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO >> September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices >> Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA >> Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Javabeantester-users mailing list >> Jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >> > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) > > iD8DBQFDIbar6IzK3cZIYNkRAk3zAKCXPo/NXPnGHX+nHUMgftHEHno7EwCggZ7r > RVjhnDM+I3fqrfUq/SsiGEA= > =ljjM > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mic...@gm...> - 2005-09-09 16:22:21
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Great to hear from you! Honestly, it's been quite a while since I've done any real development, much less touched Java. I don't know what TestNG is, but I imagine your idea for eliminating the 1.4 tree is probably good. I don't agree that we should dump logging though. This isn't a high performance product or anything - why shouldn't we have logging in there? Also, I'd love it if you'd test that most recent stuff I threw in there (I even forget what it was). I remember you saying that it broke on your stuff, but I don't remember what it was or why it broke. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell - -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah http://www.LiveJournal.com/users/micah_gideon AIM: Micah Modell Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. (Malcolm Forbes) Thus spake Henri Yandell on Sep 9, 2005, at 11:12 PM: > > Hi Micah, > > What do you think to the following: > > * Dump the 1.3/1.4 split, instead just using the 1.3 Assert class > (ie is 1.4 assert really giving us anything beyond being cool and > modern, something a well-used library doesn't get to be). > > My only other suggestion here is to become dependent on JUnit, but > now that TestNG and other test platforms are out there, carrying > our own Assert class around probably makes sense. > > Another possibility is compiling under 1.4 and believing the jar > will work under 1.2/1.3. Unsure if that'll work for asserts, not > sure what the trickery was to get them. > > * Dump logging (well-used libraries can't afford to lug logging > around with them). > > There are two FATAL log entries, which are unimportant really as we > then throw an Error (should make them RuntimeExceptions I think). > > Six WARNINGs, which probably should throw RuntimeExceptions, be > less forgiving of crap input. > > Two INFO's, one of which should be a WARNING and one of which is > our one and only debug statement :) > > -- > > I've been out of commission pretty much for the last year, baby and > then one of those mentally draining illnesses that you don't > realise you have unti 6 months later a course of antibiotics > performs a miracle. Back now though :) > > Hen > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * > Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/ > bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin) iD8DBQFDIbar6IzK3cZIYNkRAk3zAKCXPo/NXPnGHX+nHUMgftHEHno7EwCggZ7r RVjhnDM+I3fqrfUq/SsiGEA= =ljjM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2005-09-09 14:12:42
|
Hi Micah, What do you think to the following: * Dump the 1.3/1.4 split, instead just using the 1.3 Assert class (ie is 1.4 assert really giving us anything beyond being cool and modern, something a well-used library doesn't get to be). My only other suggestion here is to become dependent on JUnit, but now that TestNG and other test platforms are out there, carrying our own Assert class around probably makes sense. Another possibility is compiling under 1.4 and believing the jar will work under 1.2/1.3. Unsure if that'll work for asserts, not sure what the trickery was to get them. * Dump logging (well-used libraries can't afford to lug logging around with them). There are two FATAL log entries, which are unimportant really as we then throw an Error (should make them RuntimeExceptions I think). Six WARNINGs, which probably should throw RuntimeExceptions, be less forgiving of crap input. Two INFO's, one of which should be a WARNING and one of which is our one and only debug statement :) -- I've been out of commission pretty much for the last year, baby and then one of those mentally draining illnesses that you don't realise you have unti 6 months later a course of antibiotics performs a miracle. Back now though :) Hen |
From: <ben...@id...> - 2004-05-25 08:15:37
|
Dear Open Source developer I am doing a research project on "Fun and Software Development" in which I kindly invite you to participate. You will find the online survey under http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/. The questionnaire consists of 53 questions and you will need about 15 minutes to complete it. With the FASD project (Fun and Software Development) we want to define the motivational significance of fun when software developers decide to engage in Open Source projects. What is special about our research project is that a similar survey is planned with software developers in commercial firms. This procedure allows the immediate comparison between the involved individuals and the conditions of production of these two development models. Thus we hope to obtain substantial new insights to the phenomenon of Open Source Development. With many thanks for your participation, Benno Luthiger PS: The results of the survey will be published under http://www.isu.unizh.ch/fuehrung/blprojects/FASD/. We have set up the mailing list fa...@we... for this study. Please see http://fasd.ethz.ch/qsf/mailinglist_en.html for registration to this mailing list. _______________________________________________________________________ Benno Luthiger Swiss Federal Institute of Technology Zurich 8092 Zurich Mail: benno.luthiger(at)id.ethz.ch _______________________________________________________________________ |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-03-17 06:00:08
|
Thanks for looking, Henri! I have no problem with you implementing Maven. I don't have Maven installed at the moment, but I'll get around to it. I do sort of have a problem with moving the 1.4 path into the general path though. What happens if we do that and realise we have 1.5-specific features to add? Where would we put those? As for the Exceptions you're getting, yes, there is a loop with a great deal of memory allocation, I would not have expected it to use up all that was available, but I guess it is. Please try lowering the MAX_ELEMENT_COUNT static variable in general/jbeantester/framework/JBeanTester.java to something like 5 and let me know if that helps, OK? I have very little time to work on any of this at this point and in another couple of weeks I will likely have no time at all for quite a while (multiple months at least). I know that you're working an a lot of things though too. If you have the time to go over this soon, then I'll put out a new release with it. If not, then I'll get to it once you tell me its ready, but I don't know what sort of response time I'll be able to give you then. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell That which is hateful to you, do not do unto your neighbour. That is the whole Torah; the rest is commentary. (Hillel) On Mar 14, 2004, at 10:19 PM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Not spent as much time this weekend as I meant to, but spent some > anyway. > I've mavenised jbeantester a bit more, integrating jalopy and making it > run more simply. This is just because I've grown used to Maven, so > hopefully you won't mind. > > One question there. Have you considered moving the 1.4 path into the > general path and allowing the 1.3 build to override the 1.4 one? > > On the Indexed properties, my test class is throwing Exceptions. Mainly > because my test indexed properties on the bean are implemented poorly. > Now > that's improved, it takes a long time, I presume because something in > jbeantester is doing a huge loop and causing lots of memory creation: > > Testcase: testDomainObjects took 57.037 sec > Caused an ERROR > null > java.lang.OutOfMemoryError > > :) > > Hen > > On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > >> Great, thanks! I just don't want to spend time writing the failure >> cases if it's not what you're looking for anyway. Naturally, feel >> free >> to make whatever changes/corrections. >> >> Cheers! >> >> Micah Gideon Modell >> -- >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah >> AIM: Micah Modell >> It is not noble to be better than others. >> It is noble to be better than your former self. (Hindu proverb) >> >> On Mar 12, 2004, at 3:53 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: >> >>> >>> Will do. Tied up tonight and tomorrow night reading book drafts, but >>> will >>> portion some part of the weekend to have a good play with the latest >>> code, >>> including adding tests and incorporating it into my example webapp >>> for >>> work. >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> Hen >>> >>> On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: >>> >>>> I've completed and checked in my initial pass at Indexed Property >>>> support. I've added a functional Indexed Property to the InnerJBean >>>> used for testing and all the existing tests still pass, but I have >>>> not >>>> yet written any failure tests. >>>> >>>> Please take a look and let me know if it works the way you would >>>> expect >>>> it to work. If you want to author and submit some failure test >>>> cases, >>>> that'd be great if you have some practical uses for the feature at >>>> hand. Also, I'd love to have more eyes on the code itself. >>>> >>>> Cheers! >>>> >>>> Micah Gideon Modell >>>> -- >>>> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah >>>> AIM: Micah Modell >>>> Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. >>>> (Malcolm Forbes) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >>>> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO >>>> of >>>> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >>>> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/? >>>> ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Javabeantester-users mailing list >>>> Jav...@li... >>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------- >>> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >>> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >>> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >>> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Javabeantester-users mailing list >>> Jav...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >>> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Javabeantester-users mailing list >> Jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2004-03-15 03:20:07
|
Not spent as much time this weekend as I meant to, but spent some anyway. I've mavenised jbeantester a bit more, integrating jalopy and making it run more simply. This is just because I've grown used to Maven, so hopefully you won't mind. One question there. Have you considered moving the 1.4 path into the general path and allowing the 1.3 build to override the 1.4 one? On the Indexed properties, my test class is throwing Exceptions. Mainly because my test indexed properties on the bean are implemented poorly. Now that's improved, it takes a long time, I presume because something in jbeantester is doing a huge loop and causing lots of memory creation: Testcase: testDomainObjects took 57.037 sec Caused an ERROR null java.lang.OutOfMemoryError :) Hen On Fri, 12 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > Great, thanks! I just don't want to spend time writing the failure > cases if it's not what you're looking for anyway. Naturally, feel free > to make whatever changes/corrections. > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > AIM: Micah Modell > It is not noble to be better than others. > It is noble to be better than your former self. (Hindu proverb) > > On Mar 12, 2004, at 3:53 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > Will do. Tied up tonight and tomorrow night reading book drafts, but > > will > > portion some part of the weekend to have a good play with the latest > > code, > > including adding tests and incorporating it into my example webapp for > > work. > > > > Thanks, > > > > Hen > > > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > > >> I've completed and checked in my initial pass at Indexed Property > >> support. I've added a functional Indexed Property to the InnerJBean > >> used for testing and all the existing tests still pass, but I have not > >> yet written any failure tests. > >> > >> Please take a look and let me know if it works the way you would > >> expect > >> it to work. If you want to author and submit some failure test cases, > >> that'd be great if you have some practical uses for the feature at > >> hand. Also, I'd love to have more eyes on the code itself. > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> Micah Gideon Modell > >> -- > >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > >> AIM: Micah Modell > >> Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. > >> (Malcolm Forbes) > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Javabeantester-users mailing list > >> Jav...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > >> > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Javabeantester-users mailing list > > Jav...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-03-12 14:00:28
|
Great, thanks! I just don't want to spend time writing the failure cases if it's not what you're looking for anyway. Naturally, feel free to make whatever changes/corrections. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell It is not noble to be better than others. It is noble to be better than your former self. (Hindu proverb) On Mar 12, 2004, at 3:53 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > Will do. Tied up tonight and tomorrow night reading book drafts, but > will > portion some part of the weekend to have a good play with the latest > code, > including adding tests and incorporating it into my example webapp for > work. > > Thanks, > > Hen > > On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > >> I've completed and checked in my initial pass at Indexed Property >> support. I've added a functional Indexed Property to the InnerJBean >> used for testing and all the existing tests still pass, but I have not >> yet written any failure tests. >> >> Please take a look and let me know if it works the way you would >> expect >> it to work. If you want to author and submit some failure test cases, >> that'd be great if you have some practical uses for the feature at >> hand. Also, I'd love to have more eyes on the code itself. >> >> Cheers! >> >> Micah Gideon Modell >> -- >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah >> AIM: Micah Modell >> Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. >> (Malcolm Forbes) >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Javabeantester-users mailing list >> Jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >> > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2004-03-12 09:12:27
|
Will do. Tied up tonight and tomorrow night reading book drafts, but will portion some part of the weekend to have a good play with the latest code, including adding tests and incorporating it into my example webapp for work. Thanks, Hen On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > I've completed and checked in my initial pass at Indexed Property > support. I've added a functional Indexed Property to the InnerJBean > used for testing and all the existing tests still pass, but I have not > yet written any failure tests. > > Please take a look and let me know if it works the way you would expect > it to work. If you want to author and submit some failure test cases, > that'd be great if you have some practical uses for the feature at > hand. Also, I'd love to have more eyes on the code itself. > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > AIM: Micah Modell > Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. > (Malcolm Forbes) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-03-11 05:50:31
|
I've completed and checked in my initial pass at Indexed Property support. I've added a functional Indexed Property to the InnerJBean used for testing and all the existing tests still pass, but I have not yet written any failure tests. Please take a look and let me know if it works the way you would expect it to work. If you want to author and submit some failure test cases, that'd be great if you have some practical uses for the feature at hand. Also, I'd love to have more eyes on the code itself. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell Education's purpose is to replace an empty mind with an open one. (Malcolm Forbes) |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2004-03-05 15:25:22
|
Should have time yeah. Hen On Fri, 5 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > Ah... Taglibs are fun and powerful! Enjoy! > > I'm currently in the middle of implementing indexed properties and I > imagine I should have it implemented by Monday (if not this evening). > I'll post it when I've finished for you to look at. Will you have time > to take a look at the changes and tests to make sure they function the > way you want? > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > AIM: Micah Modell > No idea is conceived in our minds independent of our five senses. > (Albert Einstein) > > On Mar 05, 2004, at 1:53 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > > > > > Currently got my itch in jsp-taglibs. I'm writing an example > > hibernate/struts/jsp application for developers at work to use as a > > design > > guide. > > > > The feature I want to work on next for javabeantester [indexed > > properties] > > is part of this example app, but not something I've got to yet. > > > > I've got no changes in my sandbox for jbeantester at the moment. > > > > Hen > > > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > > > >> I implemented Jalopy for code beautification today. It's all > >> configured and everything, all you need to do is set up Jalopy with > >> the > >> Ant Plugin on your machine and it should just work for you. Please > >> run > >> the 'format' Ant task from now on prior to committing any changes. > >> I'm > >> open to changing the formatting selections, just as long as it's > >> standard from now on. This should prevent any future instances of > >> 'tabs instead of spaces' and 'you re-indented the file and I've lost > >> any sort of meaningful diffs as a result' sorts of issues. > >> > >> On another note, I'd like to do another release at the end of this > >> month (March). Please make sure that any features you've added have > >> the accompanying test cases and that they function properly. Also, > >> please try to complete anything that you've grabbed in the Tracker > >> (obviously with test cases) by this time. > >> > >> Cheers! > >> > >> Micah Gideon Modell > >> -- > >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > >> AIM: Micah Modell > >> It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought > >> without accepting it. (Aristotle) > >> > >> > >> > >> ------------------------------------------------------- > >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Javabeantester-users mailing list > >> Jav...@li... > >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > >> > > > > > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > > _______________________________________________ > > Javabeantester-users mailing list > > Jav...@li... > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-03-05 15:22:58
|
Ah... Taglibs are fun and powerful! Enjoy! I'm currently in the middle of implementing indexed properties and I imagine I should have it implemented by Monday (if not this evening). I'll post it when I've finished for you to look at. Will you have time to take a look at the changes and tests to make sure they function the way you want? Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell No idea is conceived in our minds independent of our five senses. (Albert Einstein) On Mar 05, 2004, at 1:53 AM, Henri Yandell wrote: > > > Currently got my itch in jsp-taglibs. I'm writing an example > hibernate/struts/jsp application for developers at work to use as a > design > guide. > > The feature I want to work on next for javabeantester [indexed > properties] > is part of this example app, but not something I've got to yet. > > I've got no changes in my sandbox for jbeantester at the moment. > > Hen > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > >> I implemented Jalopy for code beautification today. It's all >> configured and everything, all you need to do is set up Jalopy with >> the >> Ant Plugin on your machine and it should just work for you. Please >> run >> the 'format' Ant task from now on prior to committing any changes. >> I'm >> open to changing the formatting selections, just as long as it's >> standard from now on. This should prevent any future instances of >> 'tabs instead of spaces' and 'you re-indented the file and I've lost >> any sort of meaningful diffs as a result' sorts of issues. >> >> On another note, I'd like to do another release at the end of this >> month (March). Please make sure that any features you've added have >> the accompanying test cases and that they function properly. Also, >> please try to complete anything that you've grabbed in the Tracker >> (obviously with test cases) by this time. >> >> Cheers! >> >> Micah Gideon Modell >> -- >> http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah >> AIM: Micah Modell >> It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought >> without accepting it. (Aristotle) >> >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------- >> This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials >> Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of >> GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system >> administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click >> _______________________________________________ >> Javabeantester-users mailing list >> Jav...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users >> > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2004-03-05 07:10:56
|
Currently got my itch in jsp-taglibs. I'm writing an example hibernate/struts/jsp application for developers at work to use as a design guide. The feature I want to work on next for javabeantester [indexed properties] is part of this example app, but not something I've got to yet. I've got no changes in my sandbox for jbeantester at the moment. Hen On Thu, 4 Mar 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > I implemented Jalopy for code beautification today. It's all > configured and everything, all you need to do is set up Jalopy with the > Ant Plugin on your machine and it should just work for you. Please run > the 'format' Ant task from now on prior to committing any changes. I'm > open to changing the formatting selections, just as long as it's > standard from now on. This should prevent any future instances of > 'tabs instead of spaces' and 'you re-indented the file and I've lost > any sort of meaningful diffs as a result' sorts of issues. > > On another note, I'd like to do another release at the end of this > month (March). Please make sure that any features you've added have > the accompanying test cases and that they function properly. Also, > please try to complete anything that you've grabbed in the Tracker > (obviously with test cases) by this time. > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > AIM: Micah Modell > It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought > without accepting it. (Aristotle) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by: IBM Linux Tutorials > Free Linux tutorial presented by Daniel Robbins, President and CEO of > GenToo technologies. Learn everything from fundamentals to system > administration.http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=1470&alloc_id=3638&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-03-04 19:39:12
|
I implemented Jalopy for code beautification today. It's all configured and everything, all you need to do is set up Jalopy with the Ant Plugin on your machine and it should just work for you. Please run the 'format' Ant task from now on prior to committing any changes. I'm open to changing the formatting selections, just as long as it's standard from now on. This should prevent any future instances of 'tabs instead of spaces' and 'you re-indented the file and I've lost any sort of meaningful diffs as a result' sorts of issues. On another note, I'd like to do another release at the end of this month (March). Please make sure that any features you've added have the accompanying test cases and that they function properly. Also, please try to complete anything that you've grabbed in the Tracker (obviously with test cases) by this time. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it. (Aristotle) |
From: Henri Y. <ba...@ge...> - 2004-01-21 05:53:14
|
Seems to work fine :) I went ahead and committed the maven project.xml I've been using to build jbeantester as a way to test and share. Hen On Tue, 20 Jan 2004, Micah Gideon Modell wrote: > Bayard has been added as a developer on the project. Please check that > you have write access to CVS. > > Cheers! > > Micah Gideon Modell > -- > http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah > AIM: Micah Modell > If there was no God, it would be necessary to invent him. (Voltaire) > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 > Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration > See the breadth of Eclipse activity. February 3-5 in Anaheim, CA. > http://www.eclipsecon.org/osdn > _______________________________________________ > Javabeantester-users mailing list > Jav...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/javabeantester-users > |
From: Micah G. M. <mi...@cs...> - 2004-01-21 04:06:41
|
Bayard has been added as a developer on the project. Please check that you have write access to CVS. Cheers! Micah Gideon Modell -- http://www.csh.rit.edu/~micah AIM: Micah Modell If there was no God, it would be necessary to invent him. (Voltaire) |