[Jajuk-dev] On base classes renaming

[Bertrand F. <ber...@fl...>]

Hi,

( The subject is tracked at http://trac.jajuk.info/ticket/1520 )

I'd like to get a first feeback about it (we may have a vote if we get
controversy). What do you think about base classes renaming ? good ? time
lost ? do you feel confortable with current names and afraid to change or
the opposite ?

At a first glance, I imagine three basic possible scenarios :
1 : We do nothing at all
2 : We perform a few minimal changes : Author -> Artist, Style-> Genre
without any current collection need for upgrades.
3: Scenario 2 + changes requiring collection upgrades (for examples of them,
see the UpgradeManager, jajuk 1.9dev is backward compatible with jajuk 0.1
of march 2003 !). This includes : ParameterView -> PreferenceView rename and
collection XML items renaming. Note that these changes are not very
complicated to write but have to be fully tested and are additional work.

What do think you, jajuk devs / packagers ?

-- 
Bertrand FLORAT
ber...@fl...
http://www.florat.net
PGP keyserver:  pgp.mit.edu
Try Jajuk Advanced jukebox (http://jajuk.info)