Re: [ISECOM-discuss] channels

[Pete H. <pe...@is...>]

> VoIP falls where?

It is a combination of channels.  Channels are points to test but it's
not uncommon that technologies will continue to cross the boundaries.
If I have to test an office that has PDAs that use wireless LANs to
transmit calls via VOIP, I would need to test mostly all 5 channels at
least in part.

 > Just call it Human Interaction .. or People .. or something like that?

like HUMSEC?

> 
> I like mimicing the SIG INT type names.  If we want more open adoption, we should use terms that are used at places that take security seriously.
> 

True.  ut it gets complicated sticking with military specs.  For example:

1.Personnel Security (humsec)
2.Physical Security (physsec, opsec)
3.Telecommunications Security (comsec)
4.Wireless Communications Security (sigsec, elsec)
5.Data Networks Security (comsec)

So how does the military differentiate data network security from
telecommunications?

> I like the terms from the rainbow series and the common criteria.  Common Criteria is a world wide standard, not just a US thing.
> 

I searched through looking for channel names but came up light.
Suggestions on definitions misused in 2.1 that could be changed?

-pete.