From: Br E. <bre...@gm...> - 2007-06-06 14:03:20
|
Sorry Ming, I'm not following this. Are we saying that there are instances where the same iqn would be used for multiple LUNs? If so, I am then to equate an iqn to a SCSI adapter? If so, does this relate to Ross' MPIO comment? I'm not sure I follow how MPIO changes the scenario. I'm a little vague on recalling the number LUNs because if I recall they changed from 15 in SCSI to 127 SCSI-2, I assume IET supports 128? Thanks for the further insight, very much appreciate it. On 6/6/07, Ming Zhang <bla...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, 2007-06-05 at 22:19 -0500, Br Ent wrote: > > Ross, > > > > If I understand your comment on using ScsiId, are you are suggesting > > this in order provide consistant client device naming? If so, I have > > a udev rules script that does this by creating a device directory in > > /dev/iscsi like "iqn.2007-01.com.abc:storage.readwrite.efg" based on > > the iQN (iSCSI Qualified Name) from IET. Perhaps my examples using > > /dev/sde made it seem otherwise, but I in reality I'm not using > > /dev/sdx devices. Am I missing something? > > use iqn name only make sense when u have 1 LUN per target. > > > Thanks, > > Brent |