[iscsi-mgmt-api-reflib] ULP's in the IMA document.

[David W. <da...@ne...>]

A couple questions.

1. Is it really necessary to mention ULP's since iSCSI is only defined 
for TCP?
Perhaps this should be removed entirely from the IMA document, since it
seems to be just taking up space and won't be used.  If there's a need for
it in say, IMA 2.0, we can add it.  (I've probably missed something 
again, so
please fill me in.)

2. If we want to leave ULPs in the document, then should the supportedUlps
field be a fixed size type (i.e. IMA_UINT32) instead of the potentially 
variable
sized type IMA_UINT?

Thanks.