From: VANHULLEBUS Y. <va...@fr...> - 2007-02-17 17:52:44
|
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 08:56:29PM +0100, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: > VANHULLEBUS Yvan <va...@fr...> wrote: > > > This patch is NOT the good way to fix that. > > > > The good way is to use %zu, which wants a size_t. > > Didn't we have this discussion a long time ago? If I recall correctly, > there are systems where %zu does not exist. Am I right? Yes, and we have a test for that on configure, and a workaround on plog.c if configure enabled it to replace all the %zu by %lu, or something like that. So it is really safe and "the good way" to use %zu. Yvan. |