From: Matthew G. <mg...@sh...> - 2006-09-18 08:12:15
|
VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: > On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 07:48:36AM +0000, Emmanuel Dreyfus wrote: >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2006 at 09:19:00AM +0200, VANHULLEBUS Yvan wrote: >>> Right, cfparse.c and cftolen.c *are* on the CVS. >>> >>> They were imported in 2005/11/21 by Manu, I don't know why, and I just >>> checked that those files are regenerated when doing a make (of course, >>> they are generated files out of date from the source .y / .l files). >>> >>> >>> Manu, could you give us more informations about the reason why those >>> files are on the CVS ???? >> I don't know, but it's a bad idea. Since we all have different versions >> of flex/bison, this tends to produce endless CVS conflicts on updates. >> >> I think they should be removed. > > I agree, and I'm removing them... > > At worst, if that break some things, it will raise some other problems > where those files were not correctly regenerated..... > This is strange. When I try to check diffs for a .y or .l file, CVS claims not know about them. Do they need a special exception for versioning because they are not .h or .c/.cpp files? cvs diff cfparse.y cvs diff: I know nothing about cfparse.y Thanks, -Matthew |