From: Ming Z. <mi...@el...> - 2006-10-31 01:28:40
|
On Mon, 2006-10-30 at 16:00 -0700, Liang Yang wrote: > Hi, > > IOMeter originally plan to use multiple managers for multiple machines (each > machine get its own manager). However, I do find some problems when I > spawned multiple managers on the same machine (multiple instances of dynamo > are spawned on the same Linux platform). why u want to run multiple dynamo on same box? > > It seems those workers from different managers all use the same position for > random read/write, this bring up cache effect even for random read/write > after comparing the data between single manager and multiple managers with > the same number of I/Os(cache effect for sequential read/write with multiple > workers is obvious as they re-read/re-write the same address). yes, quiet possible. > > I think the same random number icould be broadcasted to all managers instead > of broadcasting a unique random number to each manager. This may not be a > good design even though people typically think managers should be on > different machines. it could be changed to start from different seeds. > > Can anyone give me some thoughts here? > > Thanks, > > Liang > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? > Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier > Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 > _______________________________________________ > Iometer-user mailing list > Iom...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iometer-user |