Re: [Indlinux-group] Indic languages locales?

[Christian P. <bu...@de...>]

> Most of the Indic locales are already gone in glibc, eg. hi_IN
> (Hindi), mr_IN, ta_IN, te_IN etc have been in for a long time, and
> recently, ml_IN, kn_IN, pa_IN, gu_IN etc were also added. Though I

I didn't check all locales, yes.

Currently, Debian has:

root@mykerinos:/var/log# grep  "_IN" /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
ar_IN UTF-8
bn_IN UTF-8
en_IN UTF-8
gu_IN UTF-8
hi_IN UTF-8
kn_IN UTF-8
ml_IN UTF-8
mr_IN UTF-8
pa_IN UTF-8
ta_IN UTF-8
te_IN UTF-8
root@mykerinos:/var/log# grep  "_BD" /usr/share/i18n/SUPPORTED
bn_BD UTF-8

No locale for Sri Lanka (I'm blatently ignorant here...but languages
in LK are Indic script languages, right=A0?...I know some political
problems lie there....)

While talking about the region of India, what about Nepali? Is this an
Indic script language or another family?

What about Urdu, also=A0? Different language family=A0?
(/me cross fingers for not raising political issues....)