From: Bob R. <rog...@rg...> - 2002-09-28 16:12:46
|
Here's a thought: Suppose we ask people what they plan to do once the new M-. becomes available in CVS. Answers could include: 1. Keep tracking head, and wait until the new stuff was backported; 2. Track the new M-. version, using HEAD only if M-. breaks; or 3. Track both versions, using whichever one worked best at the time. If answers fell mostly into the last two categories, then it might save work overall to create a "STABLE" branch instead, and just put the new M-. code directly into HEAD. Does that sound reasonable? -- Bob Rogers http://rgrjr.dyndns.org/ |