From: Bob R. <rog...@rg...> - 2002-09-24 19:02:44
|
From: Daniel Barlow <da...@te...> Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 16:41:52 +0100 General advice for CVS branches : . . . Thanks for the tutorial; I, for one, could certainly use it! The cvs reference I always use is the one whose URL I can never remember but which I always find by googling "loria cvs manual". It's probably just the HTMLized Texinfo manual anyway, but IWFM It does look like a version of the Info documentation, and it also appears to be similar to what's in /usr/doc/cvs-1.10.5/cvs.ps on my archaic Red Hat system. But it's not so much documentation I lack as real world advice, such as, "Is back-porting patches really as much of a pain as it appears?" On the other hand, I am beginning to suspect that the hassle is directly proportional to the number of actual patch conflicts, and not the total volume of patches. Since I am effectively adding a few files, replacing nearly all of ilisp-src.el, and the changes to other files are small, my concern is probably misplaced, eh? I haven't looked at the new M-. stuff yet, but I certainly plan to - it sounds very appealing. I'm a big fan of edit-definitions anyway; if these changes make it work more often, I'm all for it. -dan There are a few cases where it works better without the patch, and that's why I don't want to dump this into everybody's lap (i.e. on HEAD) before those are fixed (the ones I know about, anyway). Overall, though, the "hit rate" is noticeably better, especially for weirdo things like defstruct accessors that aren't usually named explicitly at the point of definition. (And it's been a fun thing to hack on, almost as much of an "instant gratification" sort of rush as interactive graphics. ;-) Once this stuff gets used, there will be incentive to improve support for it in free Lisps -- for instance, by adding the necessary source file name recording so that you can find variables in CMUCL. Ideally, there ought to be a public-domain portable source file name recording module that apps or Lisp implementations could just drop in . . . Dream on, -- Bob |