Re: [Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X

[Andrew C. O. <aco...@ap...>]

I don't think IKVM works with mint.  So that I guess explains it so far as
this JIT is concerned.

I just bought a linux box so maybe I'll give what I'm trying to do a whirl
there.  I want to run JBoss on .NET and see if I can't get certain things
running on there (deployers, AOP stuff so that you could write stuff in C#
and yet get J2EE ala carte services, maybe write services and aspects in C#
eventually, etc). I'm a little cracked I admit, but that=B9s just the sort of
thing that I enjoy ;-)

Thanks,

-Andy


> From: Erik Dasque <ed...@xi...>
> Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:01:12 -0500
> To: "Andrew C. Oliver" <aco...@ap...>
> Cc: <ikv...@li...>, "mon...@li..."
> <mon...@li...>
> Subject: Re: [Mono-list] Re: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
>=20
> Did you try using mint instead of mono to run this ? 0.30.x on PPC has
> a bug which appears very quickly when you use mono (the JIT) and less
> frequently with the interpreter.
>=20
> Erik
>=20
> On Feb 25, 2004, at 2:50 PM, Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
>=20
>>>> From: "Andrew C. Oliver" <aco...@ap...>
>>>> Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:12:22 -0500
>>>> To: <ikv...@li...>,
>>>> <mon...@li...>
>>>> Subject: [Ikvm-developers] IKVM on Mono on OS/X
>>>>=20
>>>> I know this is a bit on the experimental side but I just grabbed the
>>>> latest
>>>> mono 0.30.1 and ikvm.  I tried to run Hello.class (the function
>>>> should be
>>>> obvious) and I get a bus error (-v -v -v output attached).  I can
>>>> run the
>>>> same code written in C#.  Any suggestions, thoughts, comments?
>>>>=20
>>>> (Sorry for the cross post but I bet its about equally PPC mono it
>>>> related as
>>>> IKVM)
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> --=20
>>>> Andrew C. Oliver
>>>> http://www.superlinksoftware.com/poi.jsp
>>>> Custom enhancements and Commercial Implementation for Jakarta POI
>>>>=20
>>>> http://jakarta.apache.org/poi
>>>> For Java and Excel, Got POI?
>>>>=20
>>>> The views expressed in this email are those of the author and are
>>>> almost
>>>> definitely not shared by the Apache Software Foundation, its board
>>>> or its
>>>> general membership.  In fact they probably most definitively
>>>> disagree with
>>>> everything espoused in the above email.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>=20
>> <foo2>
>=20