VersionInfo constructor

[Doug F. <df...@ya...>]

I think the current proposed constructor for
VersionInfo is too strict in requiring fully-specified
versions with all four fields.  One, two, three, or
four fields should all work.  "1.4" should be a valid
version number.

--- Syn Wee <syn...@jt...> wrote:
> ICU4J proposal: Change
> UCharacter.getUnicodeVersion() to return a
> VersionInfo instead of a String
> Please respond by March 14th 2002
> 
> With the recent proposal for
> com.ibm.icu.util.VersionInfo and
> UCharacter.getAge(int c) which returns a
> com.ibm.icu.util.VersionInfo. 
> I wonder if anyone has any objections to changing
> the current
> public static String UCharacter.getUnicodeVersion()
> to
> public static com.ibm.icu.utilVersionInfo
> UCharacter.getUnicodeVersion().
> 
> This will allow for a faster comparison between
> different version numbers if there is a need to.
> 
> Syn Wee Quek
> IBM GCoC, San Jose, CA, USA
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Try FREE Yahoo! Mail - the world's greatest free email!
http://mail.yahoo.com/