From: Alan L. <al...@fi...> - 2001-02-10 01:05:19
|
If we have a bunch of rules which are really of the nature "don't break after/before x", then we should really think about extending the engine to support this explicitly. At 12:59 PM 2/9/2001 -0800, Edward J. Batutis wrote: >--- Eric Mader <er...@us...> wrote: >> >> Hi Ed, >> >> I've looked at the rules in the Unicode book, but >> didn't get very far. I >> found the same thing that you did. The book >> specifies a lot of rules that >> say "don't break here" which are not easy to express >> as RBBI rules. > >It's clear how to implement rules like "don't break >between x and y" but rules like "don't break after p" >are mind-boggling. Rules like "don't break before r" >aren't too bad, but you have to apply these rules over >and over to subsequent rules. There might be a similar >way to implement the "don't break after p" type rules >- reapply them to every other subsequent rule in a >cumulative fashion. It is a puzzle. I'll let you know >if I come up with anything reasonable. > >=Ed > > >__________________________________________________ >Do You Yahoo!? >Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 >a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ |