From: Markus S. <mar...@gm...> - 2006-07-13 07:41:01
|
:-) Sorry, no dice. The extension data structure itself uses a trie, and this trie is less efficient than the base table trie because it always uses 4 bytes per entry rather than 3 for the CNS table or 2 for Shift-JIS. At least the part that would be put there is dense (not sparse), which is good for the data structures. On 7/12/06, George Rhoten <gr...@us...> wrote: > You say that you're going to put the > 40,000 mappings in the extensions > part of the table, right? Isn't that part generally smaller than a sparse > trie, and thus make cns-11643-1992.cnv smaller? If so, that seems like a > feature to me :-) I'm hoping there are sparse parts of the tries in > cns-11643-1992. markus -- Opinions expressed here may not reflect my company's positions unless otherwise noted. |