Re: IceWM application startup
Brought to you by:
captnmark
From: Michael P. S. <mso...@st...> - 2001-07-18 04:12:04
|
No, I mean, why use "exec". This should work fine. gkrellm & firestarter & play /usr/share/sounds/KDE_Startup.wav & exec icewm Mike On Tue, Jul 17, 2001 at 09:04:47PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: > The last one is all that is required; however, I too start a couple of > other things, in my case two X terms, which I know that I will be > wanting right away. >=20 > "Michael P. Soulier" wrote: > >=20 > > On Mon, Jul 16, 2001 at 05:23:27PM -0700, Neal wrote: > > > > > > # Created by Red Hat Desktop Switcher > > > exec gkrellm & > > > exec firestarter & > > > exec play /usr/share/sounds/KDE_Startup.wav & > > > exec icewm > >=20 > > Why all the exec calls? I'd think only the last one would be requir= ed. > >=20 > > Mike > >=20 > > -- > > Michael P. Soulier <mso...@st...> > > "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not neces= sarily a > > good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it c= ould be > > dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925 > >=20 > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------= --- > > Part 1.2Type: application/pgp-signature >=20 > _______________________________________________ > IceWM-user mailing list > Ice...@li... > http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/icewm-user >=20 --=20 Michael P. Soulier <mso...@st...>=20 "With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not necessari= ly a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to land, and it could= be dangerous sitting under them as they fly overhead." -- RFC 1925 |