Re: [htmltmpl] 2 New(?) Ideas
Brought to you by:
samtregar
From: David H. <da...@ho...> - 2004-12-03 21:44:29
|
On 3 Dec 2004, at 21:16, Jason Purdy wrote: > I'm not sure if you're just trolling me here w/ that simple response, > but I did talk about how I didn't want to use TT. I don't believe > adding support for CDBI would be overloading it, just making it easier > to use. If you're still skeptical, it could be done as an extension > or plugin such that it doesn't add any "bloat" to the core. HTML::Template's strength is its simplicity. It does a couple of things perfectly and leaves the rest to "real" code. The separation of almost everything except display is strong. Build the data structure and let H::T do the rest. The project I'm working on right now has HTML::Template, Text::Template *and* TT, each used for specific purposes. > > Jason > > David Hodgkinson wrote: >> On 3 Dec 2004, at 20:52, Jason Purdy wrote: >>> While I'm thinking about this, what do you guys think about these? >> Use the Template Toolkit. >> HTML::Template does what it does very well. Don't overload it. > > -- Dave Hodgkinson CTO, Rockit Factory Ltd. http://www.rockitfactory.com/ Web sites for rock bands |