From: Jim <li...@yg...> - 2004-07-04 01:47:24
|
On Fri, 2 Jul 2004, Eli White wrote: > >Based on a quick look, I think it is an easy fix. However you would need > >to touch the source and rebuild at least htsearch. My assumption is that > >if you replace the 100 with 100.0 at line 314 of htsearch/Display.cc (for > >ht://Dig 3.1.6), then you will avoid the overflow and correct the problem > >you are encountering. I haven't actually tested this. If you are able to > >test this and it solves the problem, please let us know. You might also > >consider submitting a bug report if you get a chance just to make sure > >this issue doesn't get lost in the shuffle. > > Hey, whaddya know :) It works. Thanks for the feedback. > Should I still file a bug report on this to get it 'officially > fixed'? (3.1.7 anyone?) Probably not necessary. The thread is archived, a patch is in the 3.1.6 repository (thanks Joe!), and it doesn't look like the bug affects the 3.2 branch. If someone gets around to putting together a 3.1.7 release, I am sure they will check all the existing patches to see what needs to be included. Jim |