From: Lachlan A. <lh...@us...> - 2004-04-24 03:20:26
|
Greetings all, (I tried to send this an hour ago, but don't see any sign in my outbox, so apologies if this is a duplicate...) How does the following sound: 1. Target 3.2.0b6 for the end of May 2. This will be basically a bug-fix / optimisation from 3.2.0b5 3. It will include the following bug fixes from Joe's archive - config_parser.1 - cygwin.0 - DESTDIR.0 - exclude_perform.1 - extension_filter.0 (already committed) - operator[].0 (already committed) - robots.0 - TMPFILE.0 - without-zlib.0 (already committed) 4. We don't include fileSpace, since it isn't really a bug fix. 5. For those who want 3.1.6 functionality with minimal overhead, I suggest the attached patch, which adds a "store_phrases" attribute. If that is false, the DB size is cut to 1/3 by storing only the first occurrence of each word in the text of a document. (Keywords, links etc can still have reduncancy.) 6. Before we put out 3.2.0b6, we run it past everybody who has commented on the speed of 3.2.0b5, to make sure that there are no configurations which cause it to be particularly slow (like having very many 'exclude's did). 7. After that, we resume testing for 3.2.0rc1 Does that sound reasonable? Cheers, Lachlan On Fri, 23 Apr 2004 10:07 pm, Robert Ribnitz wrote: > Is there any way to push the development a bit so that we get a > 3.2.0 usable for Sarge? -- lh...@us... ht://Dig developer DownUnder (http://www.htdig.org) |