From: Geoff H. <ghu...@ws...> - 2002-02-07 19:47:58
|
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, Gilles Detillieux wrote: > Does this mean the htdig-3-2-x branch is now dead and I should get rid > of my copy? I previously had copies of the main branch and the 1-x and > 2-x branches, so my main branch copy was automatically updated to the > new stuff. I haven't been getting any CVS errors when my cron job tries > a cvs update on the 2-x branch, so presumably it's not entirely gone. > Is it going to come back to life any time soon or should I just toss it? OK, my feeling is that for now, we should develop on the mainline. At some point when we near a real 3.2.0 release, we'll go back to a freeze. At that point, I'll update the 3-2-x branch with the frozen code and the 3.2 releases will happen from this. This was essentially how we handled 3.1. At the time I made the current htdig-3-2-x branch, we had decided that all 3.2 beta releases would be from this branch and it seemed (at that point) like a 3.2.0 release wouldn't be years in the future... At this point, there's a light at the end of the tunnel, but it was surely confusing to check out the current CVS tree and find that it wasn't the latest code... -Geoff P.S. In sort, you can probably toss your htdig-3-2-x version in favor of the mainline for now. |