Re: [htdig] Problems with rundig segfault

[Jim C. <li...@yg...>]

On Tuesday, June 24, 2003, at 09:05 AM, Kevin Breit wrote:

> On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 01:01, Jim Cole wrote:
>> On Monday, June 23, 2003, at 01:45 PM, Kevin Breit wrote:
>>
>>> I am indexing using ht://dig (whatever is on RH8) using a custom conf
>>
>> For various reasons, you might be better off running something other
>> than what Red Hat provides. For a production server, you should
>> probably drop back to 3.1.6. If you want (or need) some 3.2 beta
>> functionality, a recent snapshot might be a better choice.
>
> *sigh*  As a matter of fact, we're running RH9.  Does this make a
> difference?

I believe Red Hat 9 has a somewhat more recent 3.2 beta snapshot. Since 
it is a development snapshot, it is hard to say whether this is a good 
thing or not; sort of depends on the day they grabbed the snapshot. The 
only version that is currently recommended for production is 3.1.6. Use 
of the 3.2 series is generally only recommended for cases where new 
functionality is required (e.g. phrase searching) or people are 
interested in helping with testing/debugging.

Jim