Re: [Hecl-devel] Proposal for a Hecl syntax change

[Alexandre F. - FT.BD/TECH/SSTP/R. <ale...@or...>]

David Welton wrote:
>I think shallow copy is a good idea, but a lower priority, so I
> created a tracker item for it:
> http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detail&aid=1565948&group_id=122383&atid=693295
> So we won't forget it.

Thanks :)

> I am, however, a little bit worried about it
> bloating various Things with a shallowcopy() method.

Yes. What about simply adding a boolean argument to the existing copy() 
method ? Most data types will ignore it anyway, since they are not 
containers, hence the bloat is fairly small...

-Alex