From: Elias O. <eo...@ne...> - 2008-10-06 12:23:38
|
Elias Oltmanns <eo-...@pu...> wrote: > Hi folks, > > you may be delighted to learn that patches implementing the disk parking > facility have been queued up for 2.6.28. The new implementation has > hardly anything in common with the patches available for previous > kernels. This was necessary in order to overcome various deficiencies of > former disk-protect patches. Most importantly from a user's point of > view, there have been changes to the user interface which require hdapsd > to be modified too, so I'll follow up with a patch to hdapsd. Another > change is that there is no fall back to standby immediate if the device > doesn't support the unload feature. Hopefully, this will not cause a > violent outrage. Anyway, standby immediate really is not appropriate for > shock protection, if you care for that sort of thing, get a drive that > supports the unload feature in the first place. > > For 2.6.27-rc8, I have prepared a backport of the patches that will go > into 2.6.28. This way, you benefit from the improved quality of the > patch and we from your testing ;-). Also, since no changes to the libata > code and only minor adjustments to the ide code have been necessary for > this backport, distributors might consider including this patch into > their 2.6.27 kernels -- but then that's probably just wishful thinking > on my part. Oh well, I have made a subtle mistake in the ide backport after all. It doesn't cause any problem in my tests but that is probably a timing issue and cannot be relied upon. So, here is the correct version. > > Please read the documentation before updating to a kernel >= 2.6.27 and > enjoy. As usual, running -rc kernels is nothing for people who don't > know what they are doing -- there have been some particularly nasty > issues with the e1000e driver these days which may well affect users of > modern Thinkpads. > > Regards, > > Elias |