From: Berndt J. W. <wu...@pi...> - 2003-10-22 12:27:24
|
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003 01:18 pm, Nate Bargmann wrote: > Hi Berndt. Hi Nate, [...] > > 2.) The template for the calcuation of the value as currently applied in > > hamlib is hard coded with sample data obtained from one particular rig, > > which may not be universally applicable to other rigs. The true value > > greately depends on rig calibration, component tolerance etc. > > Certainly. When I wrote the code in question earlier this year I hoped > to get feedback from '890 users and I could fine tune the algorithm with > a larger sample. So far it's been very quiet. > Just a quick reply to your comment above to provide you with the data I've obtained from an FT-990 rig - ---------------------------------- S-value | Data | Delta ---------------------------------- 1 | 7 | 2 | 23 | 16 3 | 40 | 17 4 | 56 | 16 5 | 72 | 16 6 | 86 | 14 7 | 99 | 13 8 | 112 | 13 9 | 124 | 12 +10 | 146 | 22 +20 | 167 | 22 +30 | 189 | 21 +40 | 210 | 21 +50 | 232 | 22 +60 | 255 | 23 ---------------------------------- Applying above data to a polynominal with twiddle factors obtained from a least square fit calculation should give reasonable accuracy for this particular rig and model. However, it will be interesting to see how closely matched these values are when applied over a larger set of samples for this model. 73, Berndt VK5ABN |