From: Martin E. <mar...@gm...> - 2012-03-30 02:04:05
|
On Thu, Mar 29, 2012 at 9:24 PM, Nate Bargmann <n0...@n0...> wrote: > * On 2012 29 Mar 20:17 -0500, Martin Ewing wrote: > > Hi Nate, > > > > I appreciate your review of the changes and your suggestions! > > > > Unfortunately the '950 is not here any more. It's back at the ARRL Lab, > > but I could test it some more if need be. > > > > The problem is that the rig just does not support the "MD" command for > > reading, and this is how the "kenwood" function tries to get the data. I > > removed it to indicate to the caller that that command was not supported, > > although you could argue I should have left it as it was and allowed the > > error message to come back after every call. I considered faking it by > > storing the mode info after a set mode call and reading it back from RAM > > for a get mode, but I didn't have the energy. > > No need to go to that trouble, Martin. The kenwood_get_mode_if() > function handles obtaining the mode from the rig's IF command which the > '950 supports as with the '850. > > If you can test my suggested change, I think it will work. > > 73, de Nate >> > > -- > > "The optimist proclaims that we live in the best of all > possible worlds. The pessimist fears this is true." > > Ham radio, Linux, bikes, and more: http://www.n0nb.us > OK. I think you're right. My reference is the more recent manual: "TS-950series External Control Instruction Manual", which is available from the kenwood web site. It covers all the '950 models. I had not noticed the mode info in the IF command. Martin -- Martin Ewing Branford, Connecticut mar...@gm... |