From: Chris B. <ry...@cr...> - 2010-12-08 13:48:40
|
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 20:33 -0600, Nate Bargmann wrote: > Thanks Chris. I trust it all made some sense. Looking beyond the current test results, a couple of thoughts occur to me: - Could I enter a plea to put the K2 in extended command mode as there's a whole lot more info available? - Following on from that, there's some useful K2-specific info that becomes available that the command set of rigctl doesn't support. It's clearly unreasonable to expect hamlib to support rig-specific data and functions which aren't common to a large set of rigs. So I'm wondering if there's a way of accessing raw data, eg the serial command strings through hamlib, or indeed if this is desirable within hamlib's architecture. Here's an example: In extended mode, I can drive the K2 by simulating front panel button presses with the SW command. Useing cutecom terminal emulator, with half a dozen SW, I can access the filter setup menu and read back the BFO frequencies, which change with filter settings and rig mode. I need these frequencies so I can compensate the display in quisk which will be connected via a Softrock SDR to the K2's IF. Perhaps that wasn't such a good example, as I could arrange quisk to connect directly to the K2's serial port, get these values as a one-off operation, close the port, then open a K2 connection again via hamlib for normal operation. But the idea is valid, there may be other unsupported info I'd like/settings I'd like to change while hamlib is in charge of the serial port. > > I'll set to work on getting the mode and filters working. Once I get > that committed to SVN I'll post back. The nice thing is that I should > be able to test this using the K3 so hopefully all you'll need to do is > verify that it works on the K2. Sounds good - you get all the hard work ;-) I'll have a think about the split functions and see if I can improve my understanding 73 Chris g3wie |