From: Steve S. <sa...@gm...> - 2011-10-04 16:24:22
|
On Mon, Oct 3, 2011 at 6:18 PM, JamesAng <ang...@gm...> wrote: >>>>> Do you or Ash or members of Gumstix have any comments on the little >>>>> NOTES >>>>> that Laurent has added into the patch regarding the PIN MUX? >> >> I've done this pinmux change in u-boot and submitted the patch upstream: >> >> http://www.sakoman.com/cgi-bin/gitweb.cgi?p=u-boot.git;a=commitdiff;h=d4013af00f6ed8dbfce7d89cd51378a9d9e71858 > Nice~~ I see that it was done recently.. > Thus, it explains why I had the lockup if without the codes in > board-overo.c. (^^,) > > I raised this similar option to Laurent during over conversation (either in > board code or others) and he has reservation as to putting it upstream as he > doesn't know what/if there might be damage done to the board/OMAP if there > is no camara attached to the port in such workaround. > > Do you think it's 'safe' (for the OMAP chip) to have it permanently in > u-boot as some user might not have a camera attached? > > Your thoughts? I think this is a pretty safe change. I don't see that it is any different than many other similarly configured unused balls on the OMAP. Steve |