From: J. L. <vwy...@gm...> - 2010-10-15 06:36:18
|
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 9:00 PM, Alex Gibson <al...@al...> wrote: > On 15/10/2010 2:13 PM, J. L. wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 2:57 AM, J. L.<vwy...@gm...> wrote: >> >> Well it built but things requiring java do not seem to be running >> properly and complaining about a couple of those files it says was not >> packaged? >> >> When a package does not package certain files why doesnt it? I do not >> think I grasp that concept yet. Is it just adding those files >> individually in the recipe to get them to package with everything? >> >> Also when I installed this on to a already built image it complained >> about missing libgcc-dev as many packages I install after the image is >> built do. >> >> Thanks as always. >> >> @Alex thanks a bunch, I was also wondering as dumb as this may sound >> what search string did you use to find the results you posted to me? I >> never seem to have the luck finding these things like others on here >> do. > > > Get that libgcc-dev message for a lot of packages and nearly everytime I > install something via opkg. Yeah I tried to ask on OE mailing list about why no libgcc-dev.ipk is made and never got a response and no one knew on here when I was asking about it in relation to a breakage I was dealing with, and I dont understand enough to even begin to try and figure out how to get it to build properly. > > Just searched your thread title in google. > This thread has since polluted the results a bit. > > > Have you tried compiling what you need with gcj and classpath ? > Or run android and compile it to run on dalvik. No I have not tried that, I would really just like to figure out this one but we will see, been another frustrating week of running into breakages, this one builds and 4 more completely fail to build. I asked this question on a OE thread and never got answered but maybe you can explain the logic to me about something if and when you have time. When a patch gets sent to OE upstream to eliminate features as a way to fix a current breakage in a package, why is that considered the right way to patch the recipe? To me taking away more features from the install because of a work around seems counter productive, I would think making sure the features of each program should be able to build as completely as possible unless its a complete break for some reason. This could totally be my lack in experience and knowledge in these things but was really curious about that. > > I've tried using jamvm (set it up for some students to use). > Can install via opkg. > > > > Alex > > -- > UTS CRICOS Provider Code: 00099F > DISCLAIMER: This email message and any accompanying attachments may contain > confidential information. If you are not the intended recipient, do not > read, use, disseminate, distribute or copy this message or attachments. If > you have received this message in error, please notify the sender > immediately and delete this message. Any views expressed in this message > are those of the individual sender, except where the sender expressly, and > with authority, states them to be the views the University of Technology, > Sydney. Before opening any attachments, please check them for viruses and > defects. > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Download new Adobe(R) Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 > The new Adobe(R) Flex(R) 4 and Flash(R) Builder(TM) 4 (formerly > Flex(R) Builder(TM)) enable the development of rich applications that run > across multiple browsers and platforms. Download your free trials today! > http://p.sf.net/sfu/adobe-dev2dev > _______________________________________________ > gumstix-users mailing list > gum...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users > |