From: Bill C. <bcu...@oc...> - 2008-09-03 14:37:43
|
Actually, that helps a lot. That was my plan B (thus my questions about the validity of the tests). Have you had any issues with not having proper IEEE support (according to the config tests)? Thanks. Bill From: mo...@gm... [mailto:mo...@gm...] On Behalf Of Morgan Jones Sent: Wednesday, September 03, 2008 10:08 AM To: Bill Cuffley Subject: Re: [Gumstix-users] RRDTool anyone? Actually this will probably not be a very satisfying answer... :) I checked my notes last night, but I didn't start up the development platform I used to verify. It looks like I ended up using 1.0.50 of rrdtool and (here's the unsatisfying part) I just commented out the IEEE section of config... it's been a while, but I think I looked into the test's it was doing and decided that is wasn't important... I got a binary eventually and it's been running ever since: http://www.morgman.com/mon/luminary.html I never created any packages or the like... can't be much help there sorry. I can verify more next time I boot up my main machine and look at the development code. Hope that helps, MDJ |