Re: [Gumstix-users] Bitbake compile failures with org.openembedded.snapshot packages

[njgreenfield <njg...@gm...>]

I have finally placed an order for my gumstix, but the board is backordered.

But, if I decide to use buildroot, will that mean I cannot use OE in the
future without sending the board back to Gumstix to be reflashed? Or can you
develop using either system and use either/or?

Thanks.


Lord Serega wrote:
> 
> I spent a couple of days trying to figure out how to make pwc (similar
> module for web cam work) with OpenEmbedded. Ended up with using Buildroot
> which went smoothly 
> 
> 
> 
> Michael-35 wrote:
>> 
>> You and me both, and nobody seems interested in helping us.. :/
>> 
>> njgreenfield wrote:
>>> I am trying to compile the spca5xx webcam drivers using bitbake and OE.
>>> But,
>>> everytime I try and compile them it ends in a failure. I tried the pwc
>>> drivers as well with the same result. I am attaching my log files,
>>> haven't
>>> got a clue where to start. Thanks for any help.
>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p17259425/log.do_compile.11437
>>> log.do_compile.11437 
>>> http://www.nabble.com/file/p17259425/run.do_compile.11437
>>> run.do_compile.11437 
>> 
>> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft 
>> Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. 
>> http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
>> _______________________________________________
>> gumstix-users mailing list
>> gum...@li...
>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users
>> 
>> 
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Bitbake-compile-failures-with-org.openembedded.snapshot-packages-tp17259425p17306434.html
Sent from the Gumstix mailing list archive at Nabble.com.