Re: [Gumstix-users] Static linking for JamVM + Classpath

[Ryan R. <rjr...@uc...>]

This will work, but the downside is the disk space for the binaries.
They'll be very big, especially for Java, but if you have an XM model
gumstix is should be workable. I think.

Ryan

On Mon, 2007-04-30 at 14:07 -0600, ro...@in... wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> I am working with JamVM + Classpath to get a Java implementation
> running on Gumstix. I have bumped into a bug: when jamvm is
> executed on the Gumstix, I get a segfault, which seems to be
> related to loading shared object (.so) libraries. The segfault
> occurs in any combination of JamVM and Classpath versions which
> I tried (1.4.2 through 1.4.5 for JamVM and 0.90 through 0.93 for
> Classpath if I recall correctly). I attempted to get some
> debugging information via strace but it is not informative.
> There is no version of valgrind for ARM. I rebuilt JamVM +
> Classpath for x86, for which there is valgrind, but it doesn't
> trigger the segfault.
> 
> So I am thinking that I can work around this problem by
> statically linking Classpath and JamVM (so JamVM does not try
> to load .so libraries at run time). If anyone has a comment
> on this course of action I would be interested to hear it.
> 
> best
> Robert Dodier
> 
> -------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by DB2 Express
> Download DB2 Express C - the FREE version of DB2 express and take
> control of your XML. No limits. Just data. Click to get it now.
> http://sourceforge.net/powerbar/db2/
> _______________________________________________
> gumstix-users mailing list
> gum...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gumstix-users