From: Craig H. <cr...@gu...> - 2006-05-05 17:48:53
|
On May 5, 2006, at 8:53 AM, Marc Bernard wrote: > On 2.6.11, yes -- the numbering changed sometime between 2.6.11 and > 2.6.15, > so that under 2.6.15 you have /dev/mtdblock0 for u-boot and / > dev/mtdblock1 for the rootfs. 2.6.11 has /dev/mtdblock0 referring > to the > *entirety* or flash, ie basically the concatenation of u-boot and > rootfs. > > > -- > > Is this right: > > Kernel 2.6.11 and below: > > /dev/mtdblock0 is u-boot and root fs together > /dev/mtdblock1 is u-boot > /dev/mtdblock2 is root filesystem > > Since Kernel 2.6.15: > > /dev/mtdblock0 is u-boot > /dev/mtdblock1 is root fs > > ?? Marc, is there any way you can fix your mail program to do quoting properly? It's really hard to get used to reading your emails and then get about half way through before realizing I'm not reading your words. In answer to your question though: Yes. That is how mtdblocks are laid out. C |